Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265804AbUA1CsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:48:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265810AbUA1CsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:48:10 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([140.239.227.29]:60580 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265804AbUA1CsF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:48:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:47:12 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Kleikamp , Florian Huber , JFS Discussion , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] md raid + jfs + jfs_fsck Message-ID: <20040128024712.GA23831@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Kleikamp , Florian Huber , JFS Discussion , linux-kernel References: <1075230933.11207.84.camel@suprafluid> <1075231718.21763.28.camel@shaggy.austin.ibm.com> <1075232395.11203.94.camel@suprafluid> <1075236185.21763.89.camel@shaggy.austin.ibm.com> <20040127205324.A19913@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040127205324.A19913@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 831 Lines: 17 On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:53:24PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, it does. But JFS should get the right size from the gendisk anyway. > Or did you create the raid with the filesystem already existant? While that > appears to work for a non-full ext2/ext3 filesystem it's not something you > should do because it makes the filesystem internal bookkeeping wrong and > you'll run into trouble with any filesystem sooner or later. The key words here is *appears* to work. No matter what the filesystem, as Chrisoph says, you'll run into trouble sooner or later.... - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/