Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265821AbUA1D2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:28:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265835AbUA1D2a (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:28:30 -0500 Received: from [218.5.74.208] ([218.5.74.208]:29669 "EHLO vhost.bizcn.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265821AbUA1D23 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:28:29 -0500 Message-ID: <40172C5E.3090201@lovecn.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:28:30 +0000 From: Coywolf Qi Hunt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, zh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_H=E4stbacka?= CC: David Weinehall , Kernel Mailinglist Subject: Re: [2.0.40-rc8] Works well References: <401417A3.7000206@lovecn.org> <20040125222914.GB20879@khan.acc.umu.se> <1075223456.5219.1.camel@midux> In-Reply-To: <1075223456.5219.1.camel@midux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 27 Markus H?stbacka wrote: >Hey David, >I just mail to tell you that 2.0.40-rc8 seems to work really well, no >problems compiling (except a few warnings :) and absolutely no problem >running. Great work! > > Markus > > Hello all 2.0 hackers, Recently I just have such an idea that is to port the 2.0.39 to let it be compiled with my gcc 2.95.4 or any other latest gcc. At the same time, also make it remain compliant to gcc 2.7.2.1. ( I can't find 2.7.2.1, only 2.7.2.3 on the ftp) Is this work worth while? Coywolf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/