Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc:     Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        =?utf-8?Q?Jan_H=2E_Sch=C3=B6nherr?= <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
        David Duncan <davdunc@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use rdmsr_safe() to workaround AWS host issue
In-Reply-To: <20190109113915.GB15665@zn.tnic>
References: <20181220134046.7916-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20181220161722.GD31403@zn.tnic> <51dcb13a-4751-47f5-1e01-f6731a2c6f3c@intel.com> <20521afe-09af-7acf-6f32-3f6e9a971091@intel.com> <20190109113915.GB15665@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 09 Jan 2019 13:09:31 +0100
Message-ID: <87bm4qoww4.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> writes:

> So, assuming RDT is not going to be supported in a guest

Hm, why is that? In theory, hypervisors can pass through or emulate the
required MSRs...

-- 
Vitaly