Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:28:46 -0800
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v5.0-rc1 with autosuspend hrtimers
Message-ID: <20190109162846.GP5544@atomide.com>
References: <20190107233833.GI5544@atomide.com>
 <CAKfTPtDBEmcsLotp-6K1KU1wM9Ba1EpMp3niXScRxYgzjs0nog@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190108155354.GL5544@atomide.com>
 <CAKfTPtCoOK-cYLXJ--sOfpVa9RVmzOAEN1+zB2qHMCzkJN0qaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190108213743.GN5544@atomide.com>
 <20190109014218.GA8363@linaro.org>
 <20190109015124.GO5544@atomide.com>
 <CAJZ5v0hi5sVESKPbZoniikOhNxdUDtJhQrs39Fib8B03MYoMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hi5sVESKPbZoniikOhNxdUDtJhQrs39Fib8B03MYoMMQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> [190109 09:44]:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:51 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> [190109 01:42]:
> > > Le Tuesday 08 Jan 2019 à 13:37:43 (-0800), Tony Lindgren a écrit :
> > > > Lowering the autosuspend_delay_ms to 2100 ms makes things work again.
> > > > Anything higher than 2200 ms seems to somehow time out immediately
> > > > now :)
> > >
> > > This is quite close to the max ns of an int on arm 32bits
> > >
> > > Could you try the patch below ?
> >
> > Yup great thanks, that's it:
> >
> > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> 
> Cool.  Thanks for getting to the bottom of this!

No problem.

One more thing I noticed: The 25% slack can get noticeable
for larger values. For things like a 3 second uart console
timeout slack of 750 ms is quite large variation.

Should we have a limit of max 100 ms for the slack?

Regards,

Tony