Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1010489imu; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:00:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7Mc7hgiXZgr3J8bpaMxqXQa/H/Dap0NY1Hl6MrXS5nxIXe2Uqox1do+uILXKqNnHAUDjo9 X-Received: by 2002:a63:8e43:: with SMTP id k64mr6268975pge.346.1547056855821; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:00:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547056855; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eRxOd3eQ+ov239X5ecaeybAISxtEhu9dwBnPeOChjUY82AjVLSU5upxItL2rkCdGcn JkVg9pfViwm/1bgRtNSuxf0KRZGe8pT8d80+JkwV+K5U3+Vom/mduScHipQ5n+YmceF2 I3PkBbyRrs1q4gJxcalWRs1Eit/RJ4/PZcLkCq7Nt2MOP79UpzXYBcCyyEdO8N7H9uSb VUEvKONbrJC5U26on5FncOiYC44OKOvIwfx9FVT0peATdgCrFI+vmiLgvD8c4pJvEJ+S feEizY9L5YLPr3AnZq4StQof7j19DncbXdJKEBqlNMBGu2XtV2NeLk4yZgBxj0ZoG9jB SQyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=2C2snWHRKLn4kJkXeCP/a0zp+l931OoPJBmot/AY+to=; b=ps/V8YGTv3GXHTg/5YSTxGY3mcm0wh8MnkfICVmaUg11PAFb+7rbUirldcSRUqDvXb 5bgIBEGjBqvZj1r6/OclmWOjZcq31e5awBVagS6204+4y5I0tyPqNxmHEafFH5Q6fJv/ GVhIiNWNovc3Noh/JwSo5/XJmM3ZIXnDKaQQ97nCIHgz6pQdzUeiV38E9v43lonwbfEe xlkcmZriWQBKN7r0zwj9asiIfsfUMPXzInYj3MwgDcs8pHE0vQS0dsYBGsojTk8Ak9bb FiJfDJpLQGK+Rb0DNERC0Mhtn9THIGwCvE5zME5J/2BlJ6VD5ev2XXlFuCV4d5uMhiko SZPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=Pi+EHYZI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l3si9625426pld.229.2019.01.09.10.00.39; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=Pi+EHYZI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731460AbfAIP1y (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:27:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:42156 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730880AbfAIP1x (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:27:53 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id d72so3445993pga.9 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:27:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2C2snWHRKLn4kJkXeCP/a0zp+l931OoPJBmot/AY+to=; b=Pi+EHYZI8+1oSpoFdQsBOc/c6MrQgQnuh5OclYtJ8xs+7ULX+FfM1A4Cjq6EWahovv DoZ+qy6g/3Cps2qzTs9+D6QUr+4TqTcLZMM9vepBc9Sfh+5RT3Ey437A0kDaSlozKrZT k3c0AWq23fvEd9fOTemTlyISYThWPBBdUbKT6/mnwdHkH209I084DnU0tYtzbMFXm+eb vw2MdD2zyhx+YyGFRXUpt9QLLpXO/6Y03RLNj0Y3PCZRerL3gchzOBALO6LjMQzDIWxx NIYuDv2FYJ7RC//2nud0BZhT0HINYs81IlQZZ4AziLrs1o4hKw67r1QEpddBiCNPl81X 5q3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2C2snWHRKLn4kJkXeCP/a0zp+l931OoPJBmot/AY+to=; b=RjfqVJowY8WLVwh5892UQlw1vclf1kH8rlW1I2pCB+CXG7aLIRLCCv/gGcEAfk3L+q jRABLWjpii2nycJct1ncIhdemvlD5i65wzbYsIy8G6yMy7CDKBUZswDxDPG3sac7AFvC NQ1sV5+1hOJMQXQT2AKXbODqG7pK6P3uUMircMfc2HJlxGGye7Os9TsiX24kcm00Iw/s mCvcPphUB6/HAadtRreNAeh1APZzcM5/1YF3sp1lAfox4X4Qn72BpWJqj/XEt7CJmuqE g3ZeThWfa9bDw6TPNE8RlkLwMfALmiWcqYR5RO/zQamrTh0urD45Y2wGgizFz2V4K7g9 9gWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukd5lR5sPzzhe6yzoh1Ywy/YANrt74ZuhrnoGZ84f5gWeTCxwPi4 gAVsHzrEojr62vjXuHiWhgbjCw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e80e:: with SMTP id s14mr5796633pgh.30.1547047671865; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (S010614cc2056d97f.ed.shawcable.net. [174.3.196.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f62sm88015706pgc.67.2019.01.09.07.27.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ghFll-000255-FV; Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:27:49 -0700 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:27:49 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: David Gibson , Leon Romanovsky , davem@davemloft.net, saeedm@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, tariqt@mellanox.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, sbest@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add no-D3 quirk for Mellanox ConnectX-[45] Message-ID: <20190109152749.GA6890@ziepe.ca> References: <20181206041951.22413-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <20181206064509.GM15544@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20190104034401.GA2801@umbus.fritz.box> <20190105175116.GB14238@ziepe.ca> <20190108040129.GE5336@ziepe.ca> <012d24d58a542ed44c8af9f517f1bd61ab912037.camel@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <012d24d58a542ed44c8af9f517f1bd61ab912037.camel@kernel.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:09:02PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > POWER 8 firmware is good? If the link does eventually come back, is > > the POWER8's D3 resumption timeout long enough? > > > > If this doesn't lead to an obvious conclusion you'll probably need to > > connect to IBM's Mellanox support team to get more information from > > the card side. > > We are IBM :-) So far, it seems to be that the card is doing something > not quite right, but we don't know what. We might need to engage > Mellanox themselves. Sorry, it was unclear, I ment the support team for IBM inside Mellanox .. There might be internal debugging available that can show if the card is detecting the beacon, how far it gets in renegotiation, etc. From all the mails it really has the feel of a PCI-E interop problem between these two specific chips.. Jason