Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:24:00 -0500
From: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x
Message-ID: <20040128132400.GA23308@serve.riede.org>
Reply-To: wrlk@riede.org
References: <1072809890.2839.24.camel@mulgrave> <20031230221820.GQ1277@linnie.riede.org> <20040103190857.GY5523@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
In-Reply-To: <20040103190857.GY5523@suse.de> (from axboe@suse.de on Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 14:08:57 -0500)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1308
Lines: 23

On 2004.01.03 14:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30 2003, Willem Riede wrote:
> > On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >     If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that responsibility.
> > >     I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a variety of devices
> > >     to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 is the only one :-)).
> > >     What do people see as the requirements to be able to maintain ide-scsi?
> > >     
> > > Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do this,
> > > so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so I can
> > > pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes.
> > 
> > OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just sent
> > it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader. 
> > 
> > Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response.
> 
> It's pending review, I'll get to it tomorrow...

I guess it's been a long day :-), but can you let me know what 
realistically I can expect?

Thanks, Willem Riede.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/