Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:36:38 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     y2038@lists.linaro.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
        mattst88@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, paul.burton@mips.com,
        deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
        dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, luto@kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, firoz.khan@linaro.org,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, deepa.kernel@gmail.com,
        linux@dominikbrodowski.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        dave@stgolabs.net, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arch: add pkey and rseq syscall numbers everywhere
References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190110162435.309262-16-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190110162435.309262-16-arnd@arndb.de>
Message-Id: <20190110203638.GB3676@osiris>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
> calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
> 
> Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
> for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the
> system call numbers won't get out of sync then.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> index a1fbf15d53aa..ed08f114ee91 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
>  #include <asm/unistd_nr.h>
> 
>  #define __IGNORE_time
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_mprotect
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_alloc
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_free
> 
>  #define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
>  #define __ARCH_WANT_OLD_READDIR
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 428cf512a757..f84ea364a302 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@
>  381  common	kexec_file_load		sys_kexec_file_load		compat_sys_kexec_file_load
>  382  common	io_pgetevents		sys_io_pgetevents		compat_sys_io_pgetevents
>  383  common	rseq			sys_rseq			compat_sys_rseq
> +384  common	pkey_alloc		sys_pkey_alloc			sys_pkey_alloc
> +385  common	pkey_free		sys_pkey_free			sys_pkey_free
> +386  common	pkey_mprotect		sys_pkey_mprotect		sys_pkey_mprotect

Since you only need/want the system call numbers, could you please
change these lines to:

> +384  common	pkey_alloc		-				-
> +385  common	pkey_free		-				-
> +386  common	pkey_mprotect		-				-

Otherwise it _looks_ like we would need compat wrappers here as well,
even though all of them would just jump to sys_ni_syscall() in this
case. Making this explicit seems to better.