Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp15178imu; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:56:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7DsqSikQvIY5esTELEd5q9mvUBvTOC8dazjugE4ghe399Ieyy1l7hxXry/rrew81XKkvO0 X-Received: by 2002:a62:76cc:: with SMTP id r195mr12370283pfc.38.1547168198280; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:56:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547168198; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pXsciGT8cCb+DFpJQGHm1ZxK2LIc5oPINMgfGVha28D3a57s+k0xHyfNmJ2iHORkz7 dyYk+PYhu5nhDtl7rz7/PN+kONT3azk37wvLoOpJI2hW83bX23crBYQ3Q1g+ysQ8sELS 5eahQXlfXQjG60eWQxmIjSNJj0YDgXLc6v4Qr9denGBLNP7v0irZBDwYwcSdsKV8WVtT U42Cdk34xRrrX/Djov0Brni3xyH7f3qRBI6FwqYPhPyy2OJyPyW8IdlXkBnAdOa6laeN jhTbGfSmS9uzYnj9PHCCYPaDmHdmr5RkPsMRlruZYqOe5qLP5vFOEjEZrZ++bJ58aFtE Jl4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=aYYSVpAP/XnYwzxtImxbDnmSdr8MYb+OpJ8V5+H7hRI=; b=mjQBQIbkfXwl6KwJcz3Jh3G5SvLUFZ3btm/EEJOkUM/dbEZChs40mEWLfuOYhLzdr4 eSUSFVskLRTTE8+5QDZtIxuQOWoJ4GHJR6xxjKS7f+1/pb/xapMmV4dgZ+vF6xEFDa14 AhCfktHxgl4mNFo4yvp5wGuH4B8FjjZX6lsHzw96Ecz5gokc7H9kbZ4mwAJQu4t6fYAO tLREJXZ/5O04qRmR6T9wJ3oss9mQ800FYEnJedO6dgrLdZ18e+Gsd0vXJ0JH+Hui0CDq Z7FG6VMi2YTiiyzsAWn9GeVYKpHYfQ6MIM6LE+KZlcxhgsI+mJNjpDL6uNCaviKh5OA6 lYbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@synopsys.com header.s=mail header.b=SqmSf2Nr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=synopsys.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gn20si8431598plb.98.2019.01.10.16.56.23; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@synopsys.com header.s=mail header.b=SqmSf2Nr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=synopsys.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728553AbfAKA0t (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:26:49 -0500 Received: from smtprelay2.synopsys.com ([198.182.60.111]:46902 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727634AbfAKA0r (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:26:47 -0500 Received: from mailhost.synopsys.com (mailhost3.synopsys.com [10.12.238.238]) by smtprelay.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EB710C0D59; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synopsys.com; s=mail; t=1547166407; bh=eKBup9uhbGbyAPqlLa4zZa3Jtqj2PAt9eLGZkA1RvN4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SqmSf2NrQugccT38I5aHfN4WFd6vJlQdry2qm8IJGUX2JbU0uKPyw1epBo6W8oxK2 utBjd2Pz0AtwCcCTULpwDz1bmiYsRJJvVNjtgphq/lkDy1crFKgXDb8aFavfTFBcq3 9Mr5smW2c5dHkYkYJfu7Xb6WOCJFCdPCqBfa1M98RQUA79zl+UxfTURhlRZIH4y6Wq 8mN5jOgB5BhMWbZgbz0uwSOG/AueWakpTA2WPe4RvFM6ZTMlAvbnqPCz+VNOEPHpap pQwVZedlhtdi1U0DfuqTUVaMBcwRDiTy67Vl9EosS43I/HKR1jKhuSd+yFiLU/5toX f7kMbiWCbTZbA== Received: from US01WEHTC2.internal.synopsys.com (us01wehtc2-vip.internal.synopsys.com [10.12.239.238]) by mailhost.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA10344D; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from IN01WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com (10.144.199.104) by US01WEHTC2.internal.synopsys.com (10.12.239.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:46 -0800 Received: from IN01WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.144.199.105) by IN01WEHTCA.internal.synopsys.com (10.144.199.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:56:45 +0530 Received: from vineetg-Latitude-E7450.internal.synopsys.com (10.10.161.70) by IN01WEHTCB.internal.synopsys.com (10.144.199.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:56:46 +0530 From: Vineet Gupta To: CC: , , , Vineet Gupta , Alexander Viro , Theodore Ts'o , Subject: [PATCH 2/3] fs: inode_set_flags() replace opencoded set_mask_bits() Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:26:26 -0800 Message-ID: <1547166387-19785-3-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1547166387-19785-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> References: <1547166387-19785-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.10.161.70] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It seems that 5f16f3225b0624 and 00a1a053ebe5, both with same commitlog ("ext4: atomically set inode->i_flags in ext4_set_inode_flags()") introduced the set_mask_bits API, but somehow missed not using it in ext4 in the end Also, set_mask_bits is used in fs quite a bit and we can possibly come up with a generic llsc based implementation (w/o the cmpxchg loop) Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Theodore Ts'o Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta --- fs/inode.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 0cd47fe0dbe5..799b0c4beda8 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -2096,14 +2096,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_dio_wait); void inode_set_flags(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags, unsigned int mask) { - unsigned int old_flags, new_flags; - WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~mask); - do { - old_flags = READ_ONCE(inode->i_flags); - new_flags = (old_flags & ~mask) | flags; - } while (unlikely(cmpxchg(&inode->i_flags, old_flags, - new_flags) != old_flags)); + set_mask_bits(&inode->i_flags, mask, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_set_flags); -- 2.7.4