Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp336308imu; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:02:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7bG/k7nx5DPpSXej/0lLy+8vyDDIST5WFwgMPb2M8LAnfZvM8O/Nfp5vhh9KCrwnKSi+O0 X-Received: by 2002:a62:cf84:: with SMTP id b126mr13550733pfg.98.1547197356977; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:02:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547197356; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rlHlkEgSeVoXrU5uLwRiXAnv/fJQNPwWRg5+sWlfaNSlAqusSEHrJDsz0y/Ll9WFE1 lIH5OBgMknxZRxoOWsbNYQZulRRzD4c0BCJ5PG49e02Vd2YV0M5jWIjDcFj0pj6BRCgC 1RsRmtRlcLT0u1UEOXrFWI+0IctijtV2oSouktN8qfi9uIprZ7uDrcOW8aWM77jXjiSz qFaMbhanRWeT6ZUOsXdJFNFNKeF90jipmMCP+S8hEfCZqT2JSlA5yJbvp0MtualP1c5m +QSPxsrqn486Jym8V1PU362Ikplmh3dWKo0fz68NQJK7UZ7dC/hsVFyKX1z1d7Mu3H/Y cwdQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Z9NwsIobUicYWAXgjSO9bwnlOQbJIcRInw+c4EZ89RI=; b=b8rEQ5NNoVCICV5vDVy14J/M0zX2wfwLVzP3UGQIczJ5z1d8duTRi6uWN3duccIQMM 8MhcajCfALA+jhLso7iE8UUQb9/NTEBS231Nsrw/ZqpSktGKLQZBQsvmTQU4yt1Y7MMJ YmZ0ZZf2kKnW2pzzo7JyEmpMfzod5KEhy0oqzbXslhYZ3uK6IND242ncAetBhG221AOl vu3I1OcRWdsNZG9ndHoCJO1FXWO4/9XAtnxtH8hhObQZMitmGq3WGwAcje9l/SyRI/w1 gcZuDgDIbmZ9yNvzUsgtb3ySj2Z6HIwKcTltXUKfWxoskRuZqmrHSmXo4SvYlgcB0q2D /G8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e127si38269302pfg.167.2019.01.11.01.02.21; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:02:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729964AbfAKHnt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:43:49 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:28927 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727578AbfAKHns (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 02:43:48 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2019 23:43:48 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,464,1539673200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="126821168" Received: from pipin.fi.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.237.72.175]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2019 23:43:46 -0800 From: Felipe Balbi To: Manu Gautam Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Manu Gautam , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "open list\:DESIGNWARE USB3 DRD IP DRIVER" , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fail request submission if it was already queued In-Reply-To: <20190111060212.7390-1-mgautam@codeaurora.org> References: <20190111060212.7390-1-mgautam@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:43:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnt3od02.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Manu Gautam writes: > If a function driver tries to re-submit an already queued request, > it can results in corruption of pending/started request lists. > Catch such conditions and fail the request submission to DCD. > > Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam > --- > drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > index 679c12e14522..51716c6b286a 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > @@ -1290,6 +1290,12 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *= dep, struct dwc3_request *req) > &req->request, req->dep->name)) > return -EINVAL; >=20=20 > + if (req->request.status =3D=3D -EINPROGRESS) { this test is really not enough. What if gadget driver set status to EINPROGRESS before submission? A better check would involve making sure req isn't part of dep->pending_list or dep->started_list or dep->cancelled_list. It's clear that this won't work very well as the amount of requests grow. Anyway, which gadget driver did this? Why is it only affecting dwc3? =2D-=20 balbi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEElLzh7wn96CXwjh2IzL64meEamQYFAlw4SS0ACgkQzL64meEa mQa3hA//bnVIRjIdt9cCTa1TdxjxLIm7gWgUTTKIBCAHaV+rBsldkCu20tECdlxL /BURIZonF7CS4WgGj6hth2ZoPwP9KzMorvo5FG824mLPVJ6AkOssZOVD+HjezLyB q+ixy90CIiZgYBtKObY6zTo7IxiuwIKL/E/sDzxn75bosJa6JBdkDtgi5oeirynF 5Xse1ODym+/CzxXABOMmOGTS+ymyhhSBHLdhVuafua8SUKNxrL7xnhrX6kEQ+DjD Unu2Ws1QrK+gp0HzEtzaIyfrFKk20rfFw5trwhTfjjws2W+xCFFWX90qjbFd3aQt 0+HEW34N+NBBThRVN4yT8tSnRmp1FS3x8OPOpWPIa5gwJCCzhGwEs/D7BB1fuab9 yk9XYhgDC/u3heDK/C8McPF0V74kSLZAnL2ZYgNXEbBlHKTNrLZebIVIygVAWs/F GqPuL/lupJ54totYQvbIs+5a0s4QBW9EXaLa5YY0Kjqc3fZ/vYMfcHYZTO2Gzk9n p0vW9z54mCmPWvGOukx8HTFSHq3P4agXvwHJ7n6vxwx/J2FzED3YRmxYHTEtLjf6 6dqmDoA2BC52Z1bj7Q3Vf/qd15j5eltjm2WKHrkSroYHqH+ht7cxh1olMJ+bL+cm VbXHxz41nX1fww4WYI4enUEbS0sys0BMV8RQQ3lzNXPwA0bCs8c= =+Cqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--