Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:01:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:01:18 -0500 Received: from q.bofh.de ([212.126.200.160]:28689 "EHLO q.bofh.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:01:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:48:23 +0200 From: Christian Kurz To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Assumption in sym53c8xx.c failed Message-ID: <20010331234823.B1858@seteuid.getuid.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i Organization: set_eugid(getuid(), getgid()) Mail-Copies-To: never Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm currently running 2.4.2-ac28 and today I got a failing assumption in sym53c8xx.c. I'm not sure about the exact steps that I did to produce this error, but it must have been something like: cdparanoia -blank=all, then sending Ctrl+C to this process and after it's been killed cdparanoia -blank=fast. I then got assertion: k!=-1 failed. But I found no hint about this in the messages or syslog file. So I looked through sym53c8xx.c to find this code and it seems like line 10123 is responsible for creating this error and kernel panic. Should this be the normal behaviour or is this a bug in the code? Christian -- Truth is the most valuable thing we have -- so let us economize it. -- Mark Twain - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/