Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp475833imu; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:50:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN78Ko4QE5Z0eKAeVa+qThwSTnajSCL9yVfUSvKgVNs6+EU6t+igrQi3SvKOLwiw8ToMDGB4 X-Received: by 2002:a62:1542:: with SMTP id 63mr14368806pfv.230.1547207459596; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:50:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547207459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zt7cfD0qP/KfOUkuGu8XA+y2ZanfwwM4b9lJCeZqW7rEGB+rbkzbYn8mDiDEvZD0tV vW0lQ1Zn09ivfmhDOoe80dHqboG+8UM0o65ZLm2bGA3X1g784pj2ifoLKZpydiP7f3c7 3utHbUQ/qYXekFknLwWu2BPuJgK/ew/xpeCu9IXJToBglry+T0wM8QRra2zuxPmS650v fWfgPRovV41wtGN2AtwUfq4por7nDMVJqrch1NnQjz9rbf+dkVcgQw0Fq320f3n8RnSd EKGyOIcBtbwie8yiAFyDrBAv3L0kJ1a3wrbZJKkBt2OLTHMdz6GsahME5LfLdbY+qwv7 ihmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=S3Rel5JBm4JH27BTCZn0oN33ngN3mg7LWdU/eZOy/Jw=; b=zibupkQzSudSF4P+erAxgoQ2E16uGJk3jJBzSHPlcC42/GKdTE3ZzyaAXm6KKmernB T2b3qeU6dT+6MSd2eC9oNxq/lPKoGtWXgrBznPPAPDwl5uOR0q43/HNOxI3q8lu/5z7x uotgwYEhyBy7VtkD2y/uN3FaSlwRw1+C61w3zYkwpw/Tv14RYpmVyAGwks7tDvLdHoDm 6Y2vUyYTv4yhx746h7pTHSavFNwdIq2/gpmaXUi+1Rlh1kYPReWR2chj/SO5iCKPlgPE L5fA2Mu9lkwrJqlj92TPZWoY1G1SPiVqQD2y7XSYjrnTqO4nfTO3dL1XY6fYylX4SigW 3dfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=avBMGCog; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=avBMGCog; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w2si6175841pgp.546.2019.01.11.03.50.44; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=avBMGCog; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=avBMGCog; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729563AbfAKIYw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:24:52 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:49334 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728214AbfAKIYw (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 03:24:52 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4DB89608D4; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:24:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1547195091; bh=L1/SuM4d76Lt9TNbAusnIQHf3WShvukb83TnU8iRdHw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=avBMGCogcx+ltKnomnRwV1ijdSNe5OBAbQvBmVNW2nzYKerXxpnQm+qJ57MEJxpzh 53QDiZfAqCVcY4DmCS67Cus/AHNU3Ld++d+9VE84vHKtWa5mfTQ502gYVCkZNfyGQV 1geamyHFBzd5x3giRBaEBlmBkByWSOoq2pIZ+Zzs= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [10.206.24.188] (blr-c-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.19.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgautam@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F111608CD; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:24:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1547195091; bh=L1/SuM4d76Lt9TNbAusnIQHf3WShvukb83TnU8iRdHw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=avBMGCogcx+ltKnomnRwV1ijdSNe5OBAbQvBmVNW2nzYKerXxpnQm+qJ57MEJxpzh 53QDiZfAqCVcY4DmCS67Cus/AHNU3Ld++d+9VE84vHKtWa5mfTQ502gYVCkZNfyGQV 1geamyHFBzd5x3giRBaEBlmBkByWSOoq2pIZ+Zzs= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 5F111608CD Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mgautam@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fail request submission if it was already queued To: Felipe Balbi Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "open list:DESIGNWARE USB3 DRD IP DRIVER" , open list References: <20190111060212.7390-1-mgautam@codeaurora.org> <87pnt3od02.fsf@linux.intel.com> From: Manu Gautam Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:54:46 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pnt3od02.fsf@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 1/11/2019 1:13 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > Manu Gautam writes: >> If a function driver tries to re-submit an already queued request, >> it can results in corruption of pending/started request lists. >> Catch such conditions and fail the request submission to DCD. >> >> Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam >> --- >> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >> index 679c12e14522..51716c6b286a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >> @@ -1290,6 +1290,12 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req) >> &req->request, req->dep->name)) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> + if (req->request.status == -EINPROGRESS) { > this test is really not enough. What if gadget driver set status to > EINPROGRESS before submission? A better check would involve making sure > req isn't part of dep->pending_list or dep->started_list or > dep->cancelled_list. It's clear that this won't work very well as the > amount of requests grow. Thanks for quick review. 'request.status' check can be replaced: +if (!list_empty(&req->list) { And replace list_del with list_del_init from dwc3_gadget_giveback() > > Anyway, which gadget driver did this? Why is it only affecting dwc3? Function driver is not in upstream (f_mtp.c). > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project