Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp538221imu;
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 04:58:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6+flsdPouvcScfPXgsazKog/NM/PDXiKI8n2ywbyzAENBklqJUfpLDLi/14ICVaPfe7A/I
X-Received: by 2002:a63:3f89:: with SMTP id m131mr13607567pga.115.1547211518550;
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 04:58:38 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547211518; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=TgByXC4YUEa4chbrBtK7VX3U+41M5chVSqSrnokqRNJqn4ULanueSC1XtrdTvtsQYC
         /iRs9Qsok1gtro3jHouTJ8cisIVUN/wf+yFAyV+Lr2ljyWxF6G3QKKGv/nbnr/VuDob7
         AM72gBsFVMGU38NxfZ89Y1sN7d73Uz5B8JVU02PPKenRBd4NmHsbu+YSYYyevMWiebFE
         4ePL4UjMvWLBDEShqHKGvYK4k5J01sWIEeW84ZoZbmDp9XJ+nbjRGBeY1yLFIFW/1mss
         jJLc7iG8tyDSECJvfQGQ8+UfOofoFxMaYUMLypnOsUuIakzMByCrALVpjdYUVXPo9fi3
         XLVA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc
         :to:from:date;
        bh=0YX3JJGYagbW9doz7wD+R2IB2mTgReexf5M8pxbdFZ0=;
        b=0gYs6aQlurk0fE2HyyKu0moBzwH6/l0IWWS6MHn0ECBcjRL7kL+3bm6PNCylfy6Qp7
         i8ezIAVuWJB+SIXFQ8mRHxQgHAm4/46WnMSjULUzXxwRmywYzI6g9KSdANHVPqBHogd5
         p0mJWChFFVtYxBy2pGrKVe+GX2Nv7aLK4bFRS5VEiVYVcnMc/lAMU5xBzL7IeCodxzON
         bCZmEoDRa/+AfFbqKi1nQQJSoADcYhWh04niSBQC4Ofn276MgqnNXx0P6PaI6+7668sJ
         BPcIEODsgaFNHjvmXdsoZnNanVwyoMfxBo0p4ADXgw05bZMeIAHR/4LmsVv6wyxDjriC
         EVZA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=8bytes.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v75si183047pfd.157.2019.01.11.04.58.23;
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 04:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=8bytes.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1731625AbfAKKFq (ORCPT <rfc822;morganleezd2003@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:05:46 -0500
Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:56786 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1731608AbfAKKFp (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 11 Jan 2019 05:05:45 -0500
Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id E3556434; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:05:43 +0100 (CET)
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:05:43 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Tom Murphy <murphyt7@tcd.ie>
Cc:     iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo. Change tlb_range_add to iotlb_range_add and
 tlb_sync to iotlb_sync
Message-ID: <20190111100543.GD5825@8bytes.org>
References: <20181204182734.20184-1-murphyt7@tcd.ie>
 <20181205160439.bjbh7stdey32hjgj@8bytes.org>
 <CALQxJutDpN6SagB89=cPvNczmD8kRXwaq-yzor7kULU4iLt2uA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALQxJutDpN6SagB89=cPvNczmD8kRXwaq-yzor7kULU4iLt2uA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:47:28PM +0000, Tom Murphy wrote:
> Ah shoot, it looks like I forgot to change flush_tlb_all -> flush_iotlb_all
> 
> Should I submit another patch?

Yes, please.