Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp992533imu; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:53:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6cYnjH4nqsE1SY44mc2ggyTXvKc04GuTH1yISG6UKx+B8Hjqt8I/EZOLvRkbWtzKhUmapl X-Received: by 2002:a63:db48:: with SMTP id x8mr14234731pgi.365.1547240002191; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:53:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547240002; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kvFwqyTXmZXYJZ6uV3bKnZw2k1zxo+Vu7y1NZpXrudK0KPpdFw4Lp2FzbLqoEpmRjF mMWs2KMHzVjISuxOScgWSXKBHWwut4YLbL8bdL22Fq6FhulhDGlgsbOGMYrKLrR3Fisc paLZpRcUa/hwXUryRaXlXTMltYyuYLCeQfYgdTI7Ty6nTZToLyw6WZVtn9QcpHvv5PTY nsn+3jHqAOZmc98cdsZWeB+nz0sNv8PS2sO43kIIDP+5LNZJeW7CCg5Jusvw4YqI4v7q DkqVMGcKt5tK17qyEN3Y7LUZqyO/1d/V58r6vWvwUWT+voKjhRDpSOILPwuLpUJgYEno OM9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=neGZ60Gzb1OL/9ZOcPsT3NkmWw1LxK5zthnHi/1AnbQ=; b=bPYj8eT/wp1VAQ9bEa925fmU9fhqoOqVWUcxcloJqCPUJtWGIHnXNsVLPtiNQh4ZIP fUtEND3MhBmGr1HPu32XNsGG5y+QRzWe8SmjUsS/g6kHhYnDeExtQU53KzgTAqsViNRr kemSSNRJ8xri81lvpNEKJSAJiKqbWKAfaVK6j9TnUZUTjVa9c1Qz2u4L0a2T5NFci5z2 aJ+vdqKq+wkOiFitKwc4lzbPGj/RvsAPPTGAzCcs3pN0U5SuF+K+j76px5IcbP2V/fyn 4u+Zb4eMwqpYHzRVR/IcBDJWtIqojXEcmeeU+dE0XsubZcnLX/vMBGM58/Xsb2Dd+NG6 EWBA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7si40974044pgg.118.2019.01.11.12.53.07; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 12:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387772AbfAKQOE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:14:04 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:38216 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387541AbfAKQOE (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:14:04 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0BGDxtW079423 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:14:03 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2pxx9w8wue-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:14:02 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:14:00 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:54 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0BGDr1H60948652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:53 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53869A4054; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F62A405B; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.91.13]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:13:51 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] kexec, KEYS: Make use of platform keyring for signature verify From: Mimi Zohar To: Dave Young , Kairui Song Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:13:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190111134303.GA12760@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20190109164824.19708-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190109164824.19708-3-kasong@redhat.com> <20190111134303.GA12760@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011116-0016-0000-0000-000002440502 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011116-0017-0000-0000-0000329E0F74 Message-Id: <1547223220.19931.471.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-11_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901110133 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 21:43 +0800, Dave Young wrote: [snip] > Personally I would like to see platform key separated from integrity. > But for the kexec_file part I think it is good at least it works with > this fix. > > Acked-by: Dave Young The original "platform" keyring patches that Nayna posted multiple times were in the certs directory, but nobody commented/responded.  So she reworked the patches, moving them to the integrity directory and posted them (cc'ing the kexec mailing list).  It's a bit late to be asking to move it, isn't it? Mimi