Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266166AbUA2QK0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:10:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266193AbUA2QK0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:10:26 -0500 Received: from kinesis.swishmail.com ([209.10.110.86]:18193 "EHLO kinesis.swishmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266166AbUA2QKV (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:10:21 -0500 Message-ID: <40193136.4070607@techsource.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:13:42 -0500 From: Timothy Miller MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chakkerz@optusnet.com.au CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip References: <4017F2C0.4020001@techsource.com> <200401291211.05461.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200401291211.05461.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1875 Lines: 43 Christian Unger wrote: >>No more being at the mercy of closed-development graphics chip designers >>who make Linux an after-though if they even think of us at all. > Oh ... don't get me wrong, i think that the conceptual idea is awesome. > Personally, i wouldn't know where to begin, but can the open source community > compete with Nvidia and ATI? afterall this goes beyond software, it delves > into hardware. Sure there are people with the knowledge, maybe even with the > means, but i doubt the financial backing would be there from the get go. > We cannot compete with Nvidia or ATI or 3Dlabs or Matrox or even S3. The real question we have to ask ourselves is, what would be the market demand for a graphics card that is 3 generations behind the state of the art and over-priced, the only advantage being that it's a 100% open architecture? I don't have $100k to have it fabricated, so we have to goad some company into doing it for us, and given the volumes, they'll have to charge way more than it's worth if you compare its capabilities against ATI et al. I've got some great ideas for how to do this chip, but they're frankly nothing revolutionary. The obvious test bed is an FPGA. That imposes serious limitations on what kind of logic utilization and performance we can get. The ASIC version can be clocked faster, but we dare not put in untested logic. (And we can't afford the tools necessary to do the proper simulation.) So, the big question: How many units a year would be sold for an underpowered, over-priced graphics card that just happens to be 100% open and 100% supported? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/