Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266230AbUA2QUx (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:20:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266232AbUA2QUx (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:20:53 -0500 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:32898 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266230AbUA2QUh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:20:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:29:23 GMT From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200401291629.i0TGTN7S001406@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: Timothy Miller , chakkerz@optusnet.com.au Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <40193136.4070607@techsource.com> References: <4017F2C0.4020001@techsource.com> <200401291211.05461.chakkerz@optusnet.com.au> <40193136.4070607@techsource.com> Subject: Re: [OT] Crazy idea: Design open-source graphics chip Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1771 Lines: 40 > The real question we have to ask ourselves is, what would be the market > demand for a graphics card that is 3 generations behind the state of the > art and over-priced, the only advantage being that it's a 100% open > architecture? Err, well there are always the server and embedded markets, if the device was cheap enough. > I don't have $100k to have it fabricated, so we have to goad some > company into doing it for us, and given the volumes, they'll have to > charge way more than it's worth if you compare its capabilities against > ATI et al. > > I've got some great ideas for how to do this chip, but they're frankly > nothing revolutionary. The obvious test bed is an FPGA. That imposes > serious limitations on what kind of logic utilization and performance we > can get. The ASIC version can be clocked faster, but we dare not put in > untested logic. (And we can't afford the tools necessary to do the > proper simulation.) WHAT!? You are making the project out to be several orders of magnitude more difficult and expensive than it is. Did you know that you can generate a 625-line TV signal with little more hardware than a Z80 CPU? Some 8-bits actually did that. > So, the big question: How many units a year would be sold for an > underpowered, over-priced graphics card that just happens to be 100% > open and 100% supported? Quite a few. Think of the TV-connected embedded appliance market, for example. Displaying a static menu of choices isn't exactly very demanding. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/