Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1017551imu; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:22:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN59tbZrlVyHX4ZEn8HYXVDIreDPCtBrmOavEQG6ErxhrnAbaASNPW4fLfCLcnqN1ZLZVdXS X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1126:: with SMTP id d35mr15205091pla.1.1547241739014; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:22:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547241738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IqXjqRwiQ+qcA5Q5j8P18DlYNaSFLJ+PHGcHCPZHjOamGRcJIPgV2OjpFabRXDPB9M 0tgrDm75IaRtnZ0qMBlYg3es6GpgqYPQwNC1ja+5nE1KPiTUgvu1iY9NbngvobI3M4Ub eVi4pDN6fLzkpW1mFYiFHg1/DiubJ/vn7bW9iJO4oA7hHFSQYBiPM4PLWO+kQKQSj490 E6sbx6Ey93cMfXH/Z7nbstWUZXE/rY34xl9XaPE4pk3inYA/hqo3UyUWzT3nLdE2+6Ly IFqgON+ZSEZVyRbhFLZE/toVz3WCf8kumzM35L6iYWkezD0HEQ7PK+wQlhTNrbEGb8Mt YBxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=o+I+Ym56Z0OSn36MmdJhysHgTvQeMg9uEQXBbPfe5qk=; b=ssNqS5L/+OCvIwgSxQ0VcG4yTI5gNVvHduGYEOaEaSCrvNwRZun+Gkny3XCa7lXOE0 3iSmj3vxyDUgf/0W1Wdd52/RohZ4gRombdExn+ufgCD2PIrRRQ4QFJRjSdDtKKxR41Sa nWDKHQK0Fq7bTcVEGoyQRdQp5WgDG2GvSsl8apo1bcNde55s5UVJ21UpdGUtTYGQ+Z+w yyYKWoiF3rIaV4WZdwuZ2XikyMLafKOMXDRqiDxxq9XAR4F3L8CLfmYIC2vHI3fj6I0j 3g95ZNi6i0K8AwM5bYsO5M8ifsUIaoPKUYeh/iV6tBO9VFXDjCwwbk/Y4oU5XXq8MV5u 9A6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=NmoVqAxN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 187si9689871pfb.41.2019.01.11.13.22.03; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=NmoVqAxN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726754AbfAKVFe (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:05:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56474 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726568AbfAKVFe (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:05:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AB812184B for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:05:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547240733; bh=Zfh6D1RVrQv4DRV5bo3WWyY1KTMtcG+15xMjCS8Rc1c=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=NmoVqAxN8PA48VD4j1Nounlg6GNvlN9s1qUcv2Gvvccms9UnDou3KOEogYX1o9Jd1 6xiBgn0R51czFlpENF6dEWF4ht4bvsKskoOa95KxU2ZrnxliI1k+Nyf/KicS29nOR+ eTz/AcOvRvkFKe5gSYa3ovMFIKSMgBNinXJYdH9g= Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f188so3630726wmf.5 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:05:33 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcW/d2nYL2zB5JIh/gC4v589j6LfY01qNFi14Crnn7/YucS1Ho4 cznOwOh7p8j/gcMujj9BQe0HpYtA8G1FqU5SirlE5g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7c7:: with SMTP id z7mr3875879wmk.74.1547240731783; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:05:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110203023.GL2861@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20190110205226.iburt6mrddsxnjpk@treble> <20190111151525.tf7lhuycyyvjjxez@treble> <20190111200420.qtyffayxceysoarf@treble> <20190111203135.5clurevf34bkiy3o@treble> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:05:20 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Static calls To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Nadav Amit , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Ard Biesheuvel , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Masami Hiramatsu , Jason Baron , Jiri Kosina , David Laight , Borislav Petkov , Julia Cartwright , Jessica Yu , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rasmus Villemoes , Edward Cree , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:54 PM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:31 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > I was referring to the fact that a single static call key update will > > usually result in patching multiple call sites. But you're right, it's > > only 1-2 trampolines per text_poke_bp() invocation. Though eventually > > we may want to batch all the writes like what Daniel has proposed for > > jump labels, to reduce IPIs. > > Yeah, my suggestion doesn't allow for batching, since it would > basically generate one trampoline for every rewritten instruction. Sure it does. Just make 1000 trampolines and patch 1000 sites in a batch :) As long as the number of trampolines is smallish (e.g. fits in a page), then we should be in good shape.