Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:04:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:04:16 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:31392 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:04:08 -0500 From: Christoph Rohland To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: tmpfs in 2.4.3 and AC In-Reply-To: <20010330161837.A1052@werewolf.able.es> Organisation: SAP LinuxLab In-Reply-To: <20010330161837.A1052@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 01 Apr 2001 05:11:25 +0200 Lines: 16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, jamagallon@able.es wrote: > tmpfs (or shmfs or whatever name you like) is still different in > official series (2.4.3) and in ac series. Its a kick in the ass for > multiboot, as offcial 2.4.3 does not recognise 'tmpfs' in fstab: > > shmfs /dev/shm tmpfs ... Use type shm. It works in both versions. > Any reason, or is because it has been forgotten ? Alan picked up the tmpfs extensions. Linus didn't. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/