Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:46:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:46:30 -0500 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:60430 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:44:55 -0500 Date: 04 Nov 2000 14:20:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <7pChuj9Xw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <3A03D466.738ED67@Rikers.org> Subject: Re: non-gcc linux? X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh5 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: <3A03D466.738ED67@Rikers.org> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tim@Rikers.org (Tim Riker) wrote on 04.11.00 in <3A03D466.738ED67@Rikers.org>: > Others that are commenting on the slow progress of some features in gcc > should consider for themselves whether this position benefits the Open > Source community or not. Slow progress in gcc? You know, I currently have a daily CVS of gcc at work, with an automatic diff mailed to me, and the amount of daily changes is simply incredible. Practically no day passes without at least one big pach, and about half a dozen patches from different people at least, going into the CVS. I don't know how much faster you can get and still hope to deliver a stable product at the end. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/