Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>, hjc@rock-chips.com,
        airlied@linux.ie, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com,
        sboyd@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drm: rockchip: vop: add rk3066 vop definitions
Date:   Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:53:37 +0100
Message-ID: <2938788.qBnkOikdhP@phil>
In-Reply-To: <20190111145424.GA21604@bogus>
References: <20181229133318.18128-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <154632658.xpTMZOjgxT@phil> <20190111145424.GA21604@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Am Freitag, 11. Januar 2019, 15:54:24 CET schrieb Rob Herring:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Johan,
> > 
> > Am Samstag, 29. Dezember 2018, 14:33:14 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> > > From: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> > > 
> > > This patch adds the rk3066 VOP definitions.
> > > 
> > > The VOP or LCD Controller serves as interface between
> > > framebuffer memory and a display device (LCD panel or TV set).
> > > 
> > > This SOC has two symmetrical LCDC's for a dual panel application.
> > > 
> > > A LCDC has 5 display layers.
> > > Only 3 are used here.
> > > 
> > > - Video layer 0 (Win0)
> > > - Video layer 1 (Win1)
> > > - OSD layer     (Win2)
> > 
> > Patch itself looks good, we'll need to wait a bit to give Rob a chance
> > to look at the (simple) dt-binding change and I'll drop the paragraph
> > about the display layers when applying.
> 
> Don't wait on me for simple oneline compatible additions.

This more or less was the fault of the year change :-D ... most of
the time I'd apply a simple new compatible earlier and possibly
without Ack ;-) .

And I've applied the patch to drm-misc-next now (for 5.1).

Heiko