Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3414147imu; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:33:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7JLcRxhh0cZv1awfg29veZ+7FEw7nA5ErH5MgjG5nbAzecPRb6pS49Usdqt4H0gHdD0uDZ X-Received: by 2002:a62:1c86:: with SMTP id c128mr25761877pfc.54.1547462038274; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:33:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547462038; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BIzlxfcYtkIESDh4BlxV7xGZdK1k/kNJfoevgBI9/rdg+AjGg8UTewXqym66Opjvum lPtjLxEysT+6xeMXqlAOr84aQq5/OC5xpn9Ox1Zfoh7d7DAsG3SJBsa6KrQ4WUQB95sr gfnucDmzoLumO8ACFUbfrvROJYLr4NyCQe13sZE0jhTJRzJ22wzWE5V2kiMYuuKuZn7V j+/p6VmVIzKRUF7I+okwUh8lN1bqsXlnMFtZOrgEWwi4w2s0KqwbUD1mpITSfBZrwm+y 6SQwA1poZHUKpRDN9vC9ZjDgfeF0qSYiAS9WgiDnl8/jJUf7o1sx9X6AX5B7WGHJnMby nt1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=22eSOSGjmMdLV6rkAbl30f4P5wKl+u52AmX586fVNJI=; b=jBJE4Dt1ZukRIxVvwyWMfQx42Ok3QW0nAVaNcOIceG0WdKDQqLzhqZqdTYBfW1Z5gQ i7dyCXbJJQZgEfh8w0rgZLey8Jc8AwgzqGkPwB61fWB2ZLtsS1aUuLJVSGKGe5rCXT6U 8fwJp/a9/F9eB7w3+p1tlBley9mrbHuPd/B5kJatstCl0OEHPVjrXisPSvT3L2ATEkoK 4v4lfaU4N0StYF3zVWa0siQzLeYI+C6gW6yUJ/xg+vVxh4DmpN5Ik6myDWsM52L+kvcp H5N93jXpkVmLNGf41WmRf9hnm4/zoy4psA3Uci6Plh10yiwtPhmpKtxVewe0MGUVnV+3 CuVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z14si28780pgj.73.2019.01.14.02.33.42; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 02:33:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726579AbfANKbl (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:31:41 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45921 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726449AbfANKbl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 05:31:41 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8F14867358; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:31:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:31:39 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Pawel Osciak , Marek Szyprowski , Kyungmin Park , Niklas =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F6derlund?= , Russell King , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource Message-ID: <20190114103139.GA31005@lst.de> References: <20190111181731.11782-1-hch@lst.de> <20190111181731.11782-4-hch@lst.de> <20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190111175416.7d291e25@coco.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 05:54:16PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:17:31 +0100 > Christoph Hellwig escreveu: > > > vb2_dc_get_userptr pokes into arm direct mapping details to get the > > resemblance of a dma address for a a physical address that does is > > not backed by a page struct. Not only is this not portable to other > > architectures with dma direct mapping offsets, but also not to uses > > of IOMMUs of any kind. Switch to the proper dma_map_resource / > > dma_unmap_resource interface instead. > > Makes sense to me. I'm assuming that you'll be pushing it together > with other mm patches, so: Not really mm, but rather DMA mapping, but yes, I'd love to take it all together. Thanks!