Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 11:24:43 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc:     perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, brian.austin@cirrus.com,
        Paul.Handrigan@cirrus.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: cs4341: fix waring unused-function
Message-ID: <20190114112443.GA11073@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20190114095540.22956-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190114095540.22956-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:55:40AM +0100, Anders Roxell wrote:
> The driver cs4341 can be built with SPI and/or I2C, but it has to be one
> of them at least. When I2C is set as a module we see the warning below:

I'm missing patches 2 and 3 of this series and there's no cover letter.
What's the story with dependencies?

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlw8cXoACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9AJHwgAgiocrClStcUh92WnpSwD5nQrZmRdfx6j4EVsN+EA+bRasylhwousCfCQ
vk/8h6FWqMkjGuIAdHw8X0OBgSAfOzFz8YJD68CAgFpWmH0FMwBDFny+uAkKm/tA
O8xQcfLZRpQbD/0+9Tw/EL6AfreE3x6g/h3EB1Uz5JEhBGMQB6rAZTmNpb9Yj0ow
sYE9KZVW2DDo557PAAVBPOvgjTYuXi+L0YsHzI7AUjPDjBEEnq/P1eWkUIIhZexJ
PQg1nGXw/FTmvgokIKi/DLiHC2Vh7LFZDsUjxbahMyu3cAc93m+cNvUc1OoP37Dg
ono2CIsZYCht49G3n0ly2eyxfqznaQ==
=WnUQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--