Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:49:14 -0500 (EST)
From:   Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio@ab.jp.nec.com>,
        Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1862896935.69778880.1547498954956.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190114203500.GU2773@zn.tnic>
References: <20190110121944.6050-1-lijiang@redhat.com> <20190114192144.GQ2773@zn.tnic> <134663991.69764038.1547494607008.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20190114195940.GS2773@zn.tnic> <244986363.69770015.1547496453312.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20190114201812.GT2773@zn.tnic> <221183717.69773903.1547497592624.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20190114203500.GU2773@zn.tnic>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v6] kdump: add the vmcoreinfo documentation
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Topic: kdump: add the vmcoreinfo documentation
Thread-Index: 1w3RLd9A9qEHPbJGj05Nd5Aij519rA==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:26:32PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > No.  It needs *both* the vmlinux file and the vmcore file in order to read
> > kernel
> > virtual memory, so just having a kernel virtual address is insufficient.
> > 
> > So it's a chicken-and-egg situation.  This particular --osrelease option is used
> > to determine *what* vmlinux file would be required for an actual crash analysis
> > session.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense. I could've used that explanation when reviewing
> the documentation. Do you mind skimming through this:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190111145650.GG4729@zn.tnic
> 
> in case we've missed explaining relevant usage - like that above - of
> some of the vmcoreinfo members?

Yeah, I've been watching the thread, and the document looks fine to me.
It's just that when I saw the discussion of this one being removed that
I felt the need to respond...  ;-)

Dave