Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 04:16:15 +0100
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ASoC: dapm: change snprintf to scnprintf for
 possible overflow
Message-ID: <20190115031615.GB6416@1wt.eu>
References: <20190112152844.26550-1-w@1wt.eu>
 <20190112152844.26550-7-w@1wt.eu>
 <20190114145650.GD11073@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190114145650.GD11073@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 02:56:50PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:28:43PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > From: Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Change snprintf to scnprintf. There are generally two cases where using
> > snprintf causes problems.
> 
> I don't have a cover letter or anything before this in the series.
> What's going on with dependencies here?

Sorry for the lack of more context, I was just involved in putting a
subject line on each patch and passing them through get_maintainers.pl.
These ones were sent to the security list after this article was published:

  http://blog.infosectcbr.com.au/2018/11/memory-bugs-in-multiple-linux-kernel.html

Thanks,
Willy