Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:54:37 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip: sifive-plic: Don't inline plic_toggle()
 and plic_irq_toggle()
Message-ID: <20190115155437.GA13095@infradead.org>
References: <20181227111821.80908-1-anup@brainfault.org>
 <20181227111821.80908-3-anup@brainfault.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181227111821.80908-3-anup@brainfault.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 04:48:18PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The plic_toggle() uses raw_spin_lock() and plic_irq_toggle has a
> for loop so both these functions are not suitable for being inline
> hence this patch removes the inline keyword.

That is a weird argument for a function which has by design exactly
two callers and is in the hot path.  The alternative to the inline
here would be to duplicate the code.