Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 05:44:10 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] RISC-V: Setup init_mm before parse_early_param()
Message-ID: <20190115134410.GC13216@infradead.org>
References: <20190107161047.10516-1-anup@brainfault.org>
 <20190107161047.10516-3-anup@brainfault.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190107161047.10516-3-anup@brainfault.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
> 
> We should setup init_mm before doing parse_early_param()
> in setup_arch() to be consistent with setup_arch() of
> other architectures such as x86, ARM, and ARM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>

Is there any good inherent reason why the order matters?  Not that I
really care either way..