Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp5030440imu; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:58:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN51yjssX7iTHp7awVkrYTltRygnO4Kgm8+5S/tkeFaaIL5xdpGhbhdj6LEgFyoAoehvpm3f X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8b88:: with SMTP id ay8mr5365568plb.55.1547575090593; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:58:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547575090; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SgAm80meQK+j1tBb4yQ30+HOTqpR6YhpOyQpWjuTFFxgzOPWEIh0+D4zsXABE/oycR jyZWUsKriBKiH0sv0xr1j78pGyHqeBa/FlvVGmZylr3DBYq7gy56+wVfqLo4npJzrELO f+xclW5xpc3Dv5VsaA0HmFK+uyPXp0iEKnO1yXkBzk5xBWPDV2mTXmFFALU8Fa2wE3Ye J8kLJHlttL7oSx/2iX6SBGl2H+tY9DFnRg8cY8uc5cyFyGUNZoA8OICfEtd3wJrLKUWg VjLuoO5WFUnVjKseh55FLD6TY1+n9J0SCMarCcveEU2mh+C9tWkA4BLxt+ZcMikqrpjG KxSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=PCkrCDYjcwlbgvVo1Gw0UkGoytvtzfaw3QUgsa7DMVs=; b=Nqg5NhTvGxqiLlxeCqyiD3uhn1D96mggC7ReGIgefqpjR2FEmqaQlLIWn09kYLV4El zkO1KAQoKYtDPfg1XkI24xbzyTjvLX/jUunP2if1YG0JGJEtXg18E9GD3FUwZLjmOGmm TLkl1lr+KJQeVOA8/12QITWAsZkVl3pTFl95egfNnMiUNUo7Vf6VMXEnsOwssdgCW8Kz 0RVkETMmtaaOKcyJwkhKBgbAhA+3o1uaTHtslctr8qOOrCIGZvDOyusEv+2czp0r7iLm CpxahQHVHuttj1WfQ6Fx6rTh/C3hUDjIk6ouqMnPNhTwCk7beHDFbmAj1BI0bMUhfzkk Pjcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 189si3847833pfd.142.2019.01.15.09.57.54; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:58:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730941AbfAOPeh (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:34:37 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:32904 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729622AbfAOPeh (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:34:37 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0FFTGEU006232 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:34:36 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q1h7h3tej-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:34:35 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:33 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:29 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0FFYRcj8388886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:27 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8601311C054; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A4B11C058; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.106.167]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] integrity, KEYS: add a reference to platform keyring From: Mimi Zohar To: Kairui Song , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, ebiggers@google.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, dyoung@redhat.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:34:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190115094542.17129-2-kasong@redhat.com> References: <20190115094542.17129-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190115094542.17129-2-kasong@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011515-0008-0000-0000-000002B165C7 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011515-0009-0000-0000-0000221D7A93 Message-Id: <1547566455.4156.283.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-15_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901150129 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 17:45 +0800, Kairui Song wrote: [snip] > diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c > index f45d6edecf99..bfabc2a8111d 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c > +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c > @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ static int __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, key_perm_t perm, > keyring[id] = NULL; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING > + if (id == INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM) { > + set_platform_trusted_keys(keyring[id]); > + } > +#endif > + > return err; > } > Any reason for setting it here as opposed to in the caller platform_keyring_init()? Mimi