Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp5047464imu; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:13:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN53pk35aV+LwuMvUGjV/M5x0Z8AzLKh5E7C1uPmXVvd899X1QVIo0eec1v6Xp6Q1nhn1gge X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ba89:: with SMTP id k9mr5413846pls.189.1547576022022; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:13:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547576022; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p6MQOXNLirkMKQJ0Kkgi1OVnjImOdI2x6Za8eDT4fAgD+gBNnhNf9ZDDHkOCRye8p5 OydltP9f9b1polv7tf144Va0R3ZGChA/aT5yC8nEuScPs1tV0RtOhrQYihEZQYqnVHpn s0o0GiIyz0NMgE/qo5KPgbIPLJlUlCTnFD3slke0+BBTDcDn3Ow2yCUmCNz9cX+vckUM aYXX7+50j7R+joJm/S6yxYYvx9Jh1CykwFL7ZmD/k3zLAFFuAwAKRSlsDqm0Fiw9asrk 1AJzvi0MqRYP9rcjEMOzce1hEtmfw8z830Ey8zNzoNDVIJq9TlOVXFFbj9r0AIjjiw/+ zIag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=/A9KLDlnv++UfWPQ3boKtnfgf3D3i42KsRgMeWWBG5I=; b=ZUOHTU5hPmEobzxZ0ZNV2xa0elFThONfNnLI7Ub19ojMjvG3P4ZQAneOvLZJQjLgVQ nlNZXn1QtHj20bUNry4gt4NNyh9C8W7qp2WAgL2kaIQUPCbPiwwp68gPhZC/ThSwfhP5 O9bnnXORxAlt2Wh3whCx3vr5KfYc6OkFLPiT8zu4u7MRN0XUiF7L5lK6l3O54JCh5jqf DlbWeu7ml9vTl7CFK1jRPo7qjLMox6k8weJZ0m5rdFIXpkHjEcIlUIDl/Hof2WMGG7uQ A/Eb/fD7FE+dZHJ4TjUfup+M0FOyfRoBmwdz2IUpmHRLaY6sY2RXKZoKEDVqDyCsJByJ ppew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z5si4167127plh.133.2019.01.15.10.13.21; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:13:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730106AbfAOP4Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:56:24 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:46828 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728971AbfAOP4Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:56:24 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0FFuLmO032717 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:56:23 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q1g50h0xe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:56:22 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:08 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:04 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0FFt29q4129064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:02 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ADB42047; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850D94203F; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.106.167]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:55:00 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] integrity, KEYS: add a reference to platform keyring From: Mimi Zohar To: Kairui Song Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , David Woodhouse , jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, Eric Biggers , nayna@linux.ibm.com, Dave Young , linux-integrity , kexec@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:54:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20190115094542.17129-1-kasong@redhat.com> <20190115094542.17129-2-kasong@redhat.com> <1547566455.4156.283.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011515-0020-0000-0000-00000306D90A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011515-0021-0000-0000-00002157F138 Message-Id: <1547567689.4156.291.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-15_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901150132 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 23:47 +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:34 PM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-01-15 at 17:45 +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig.c b/security/integrity/digsig.c > > > index f45d6edecf99..bfabc2a8111d 100644 > > > --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c > > > +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c > > > @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ static int __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, key_perm_t perm, > > > keyring[id] = NULL; > > > } > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING > > > + if (id == INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM) { > > > + set_platform_trusted_keys(keyring[id]); > > > + } > > > +#endif > > > + > > > return err; > > > } > > > > > > > Any reason for setting it here as opposed to in the caller > > platform_keyring_init()? > > > > Mimi > > > > Yes, "keyring" is static so unless I expose it to other files, it is > only accessible here. And I think there should be no problem to put > the set_platform_trusted_keys here. Right, that's a really good reason. Mimi