Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:50:48 +0100 (CET)
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To:     Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     mlangsdo@redhat.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, julien.thierry@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        steven.price@arm.com, ykaukab@suse.de, dave.martin@arm.com,
        shankerd@codeaurora.org
Message-ID: <884332236.499392.1547581848222@email.ionos.de>
In-Reply-To: <20190109235544.2992426-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
References: <20190109235544.2992426-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: add system vulnerability sysfs entries
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Medium
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jeremy,

> Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> hat am 10. Januar 2019 um 00:55 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Arm64 machines should be displaying a human readable
> vulnerability status to speculative execution attacks in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities 
> 
> This series enables that behavior by providing the expected
> functions. Those functions expose the cpu errata and feature
> states, as well as whether firmware is responding appropriately
> to display the overall machine status. This means that in a
> heterogeneous machine we will only claim the machine is mitigated
> or safe if we are confident all booted cores are safe or
> mitigated.
> 

i applied this v3 series and Marc's v2 series.

Now i'm getting the following on a Raspberry Pi 3 B+ :

meltdown:Not affected
spec_store_bypass:Not affected
spectre_v1:Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization

So the entries l1tf and spectre_v2 disappeared.

Stefan