Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1210564imu; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:53:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7JMUt870y/K19g54vawrwu+dr88MxxRoB/kVBiNA5JXjHLcRRS4VmVhyehwhuuoQn1GmCG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8641:: with SMTP id y1mr12326489plt.159.1547679222634; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:53:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547679222; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0tDVrjcwfIheqRSWNDGjkoh9/CtmxuAodSP6td6Tst8JfQDzN1j/w8FcM2jt9PNhv+ DegU/SsbEJRBOR0DxdjIuCvtLprcRk1zLVAVcPOzggtetY5xCv9pzh03M1HTTNZNbxbN 88SVqewny5NnUu4acN0C/fD28Sa3Gfl3o0bDZ6RupzT0nXpsy+Dsebh992PjuBUIooBS wFBkATUGzsrPogt81SOX2gnFohVJ4RWqxQK51/PU+WW+z+o3qqkKSX7jEEBtVo9ecDxG uZohv7Ajrj2d6YM/jogLYRtJ8w62wyuh1c0ZpQ1lox1iesbdMpUFviNi5YAICNoAFsWi 968Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=MUQIXpPKqVYhvLboX6GhZ7BxBMJyQSCsDtQG2JOfUdc=; b=ZTZTa+kMApMHsfpLjIRLfZ5Inn/6twigKLxRf9SV2G+s240nAxi53H9nfRRgjixNQf +miP2AO9YIvzWWfW4dEopHAAopZI1nUo04bCTyrCPoojUy4Jz44wibVMM0KiMJvdBr0/ bRVr29IIcoyFkZ5Mc9GdB3F6J5ab+gDLcSbgvy19cAF1dP/pwCZWLj37+0yv2nip+q9z PdMbilhgqhHdBpqEvjxpeTPYQr9ToeT0MAfy/MlELbG6bdHKbz0C+IlsFTgMtcSCEUea l0hjMCyvVqsd++aWeWF/+f+tQfDjuGl1LVozFS+TQ3FbgtkD3Z8a5Js0xjaLNbHIheX1 oUSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l12si7815638plc.0.2019.01.16.14.53.25; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405014AbfAPPrW (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:47:22 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:33916 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729145AbfAPPrW (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:47:22 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A958030; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 07:47:18 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Thierry Reding Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Adrian Hunter , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Ulf Hansson , Jonathan Hunter , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Clement , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation Message-ID: <20190116154717.GQ5544@atomide.com> References: <20190115162837.5399-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20190115162837.5399-3-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20190116132747.GB11050@ulmo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190116132747.GB11050@ulmo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thierry Reding [190116 13:28]: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:28:36PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > The SDHCI core is know properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO, > > "know" -> "now" > > > so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement > > ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > --- > > Note: this patch has only been compiled tested, as I don't have the > > hardware to test it. > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > I can't runtime test this myself, but it certainly looks like this would > do the right thing because it calls the core now call the very same > function as this used to, so: > > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding > > Adding Tony and linux-omap for a slightly wider audience and hopefully > find someone to test this on. For reference, the whole series is here: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/?series=66905 Thanks Kishon can you please review and test? Regards, Tony > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c > > index d264391616f9..c2a28930086f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c > > @@ -987,7 +987,6 @@ static int sdhci_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > goto err_put_sync; > > } > > > > - host->mmc_host_ops.get_ro = mmc_gpio_get_ro; > > host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = > > sdhci_omap_start_signal_voltage_switch; > > host->mmc_host_ops.set_ios = sdhci_omap_set_ios; > > -- > > 2.20.1 > >