Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1298100imu; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:40:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN68L3D+ySG8JDTbATIyTADdQVUyTkoZUcF+Os2j6LvnswAh0HPSHpd+xhd4lpDH6EYcVJnV X-Received: by 2002:a62:130c:: with SMTP id b12mr12775101pfj.247.1547685631148; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:40:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547685631; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=04ZeFGUGRSY7OjN62/4uVpSsf99QUxfKyyqy1g51EruxzeP4z3UVs5FMHPjv1hPiRg sTgePf3kWijJ5wSP7mTJyLYeHnA3bSkn5m0ObolLlZ+faUNOXr7tT4GWzaYjWkGgS8oN Dmre/15OJ6giKXe7/4SFwTEL4zqbDtlVyGYGuSVZeWgnaYwtJqCr3OJBN3iVP63iWgRJ GUHwS8ilG5TjkZ8S8LpPiB8G2gC0zzcI5ADwbA5WYmiMc+DdF/D8mN7IRKlW6Io1AvE+ ayG/LNZY9gwxurDI/1y2oHWBfOZTnNwov6XhkXMNiYie+3Uk5ccnrK5r3pxdOVJiG7Fg XOSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=hO8aN2uOjOhCtwJnAo6bYW3g/9b0vHQcdWD4lY7xqrg=; b=nMgBuZj5o6lH/ba0bwQbe89ohu7mdGqYM5AYSkKRRcAtpxmNh4FmdEqUR5y1roKBm6 8tw4A8SV9vhfGJkenqjkah7EQ+kkKgjW8+R5J1IlC+fbiheRgkhh5s9ydUf9WBS9T5hB huM5UM1tN5QD+B4tqqM/Gvz4ODjV7N2IMH9kXsfLLzrbokxYxFxIzBMMATG6j8A3SVEj bi4ILsMfA4BKdt7QZgL0RkG+7eOf3+msS2kzesfQQdkrKxDRrXzgLTA2v1040kr3SYA9 CyjL/z9EZ7VqFcRf3oSxy9h02JxSXEFcascxXpsFR8qE/CFKe/+ex7oDgrnE8G4EtOga mI1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k190si390743pgd.64.2019.01.16.16.40.15; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:40:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731399AbfAPVqa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:46:30 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:29949 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731045AbfAPVq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:46:29 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2019 13:46:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,487,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="115222565" Received: from lhaqq1-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.249.254.231]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2019 13:46:26 -0800 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 23:46:24 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Stefan Berger Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] tpm: ppi: rename TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 Message-ID: <20190116214624.GC25803@linux.intel.com> References: <20190109221103.1897677-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20190109221103.1897677-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190109221103.1897677-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:11:00PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > TPM PPI 1.3 introduces a function revision 2 for some functions. So, > rename the existing TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID to TPM_PPI_REVISION_1. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger The change looks good, but why TPM_PPI_REVISION_1 and not TPM_PPI_REVISION_ID_1? /Jarkko