Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263453AbUAaGsF (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:48:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263466AbUAaGsF (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:48:05 -0500 Received: from hb6.lcom.net ([216.51.236.182]:58763 "EHLO localhost") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263453AbUAaGsD (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Jan 2004 01:48:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:48:00 -0600 From: Joseph Pingenot To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Luke-Jr , swsusp-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Software Suspend 2.0 Message-ID: <20040131064757.GB7245@digitasaru.net> Reply-To: trelane@digitasaru.net Mail-Followup-To: Nigel Cunningham , Luke-Jr , swsusp-devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1075436665.2086.3.camel@laptop-linux> <200401310622.17530.luke7jr@yahoo.com> <1075531042.18161.35.camel@laptop-linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075531042.18161.35.camel@laptop-linux> X-School: University of Iowa X-vi-or-emacs: vi *and* emacs! X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-MimeOLE: Not Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1158 Lines: 32 >From Nigel Cunningham on Saturday, 31 January, 2004: >Hi. >On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 19:22, Luke-Jr wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Except that it doesn't seem to work... >> 1. patched in software-suspend-core-2.0-whole -- worked fine >> 2. software-suspend-linux-2.6.1-rev3-whole: >> 2a. can't autodetect files to patch >> 2b. alot of patching fails >> >> Is there something obvious I'm doing wrong? :/ >Yes. Apply the patches the other way around - the version specific one >first, then the core. Oh, you'll also want to get the latest 2.6.1 patch >(http://swsusp.sf.net). Coupla quick questions for you, while we're on the topic. I get lots of fails against 2.6.2-rc2-mm1; will the -rcX kernels be addressed, or will the patches only be against non-rc kernels? What about -mm kernels? Also, how does this differ from what is currently in the vanilla kernels? Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/