Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:32:54 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
Message-ID: <20190117183254.GA17361@roeck-us.net>
References: <20190116173838.042db659@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20190116203547.GA788@roeck-us.net>
 <20190117084902.GA20220@ming.t460p>
 <20190117103553.GB23565@ming.t460p>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190117103553.GB23565@ming.t460p>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > Could you share me the .config?
> 
Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work.

> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please
> feel free to try the following patch:
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2
> 
Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine.

Thanks,
Guenter