Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1544477629.git.rgb@redhat.com> <43548fafdfa98ee64ecfd0d7a69a2f5cb2c31c50.1544477629.git.rgb@redhat.com>
 <CAHC9VhSaTvVgSWVWo42Ur2k6hVNJ1XBkLwrd-J4-SUuidwXUYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190117103255.1f640a42@ivy-bridge> <CAHC9VhQvk+6AFjVU_ygyn8Q6FGwVy_JqXj7wWSNYYp5zSiBcuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190117170815.40131a69@ivy-bridge> <CAHC9VhQqT9HW=m5_sbru2Q7HoJC6oSrzMzrkRxgeDB7sWFLA-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190117192610.tswga6xweyt42hmq@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20190117192610.tswga6xweyt42hmq@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:32:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSMsP=YqbQZ2YWJ_DJZajzuQQ_jAVP3j7RV+9beD5qnGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak59 V3 2/4] audit: add syscall information to
 CONFIG_CHANGE records
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc:     Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>,
        Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:26 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2019-01-17 12:36, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:08 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:21:40 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:33 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:58:58 -0500 Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:18 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Tie syscall information to all CONFIG_CHANGE calls since they
> > > > > > > are all a result of user actions.
>
> > I see you added LKML to the To/CC line.  Fun.  Unless they've been
> > following the audit list for the past several years I'm not sure they
> > have all the context to fully understand some of the things in this
> > thread, but sure, why not.
>
> I added LKML in the original patchset posting, not Steve.

That you did, my apologies.  Why did my mail client highlight that as
new?  Oh well, my comments stand regardless; I'm just sorry about the
LKML noise I added to the top.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com