Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2353872imu; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:40:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN508Hh7RmUtMu6DR/AGhXod0c5nK4Q/Cm3nMBDbCYEpYmK8wXat3odJ7l98AREHLFbcq0JZ X-Received: by 2002:a62:1709:: with SMTP id 9mr16227950pfx.249.1547757623087; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:40:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547757623; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D9UeIeDB6cLYBnzha5v+5Xe57nJ8lOTc6GkFGbxREE3Hastw1NKcCF0XK2QncbKj2F IVSjINrScZnyLRUZzxEHAp9gxb7634M78EsO7t30fboQlR/ruw+u01TL2uxGnCxJPvzD otL+A+UoggaO6eFdIlBA+aEhUgu9t8tr5wj3N1c0BXYLvTDLu8HrVHrvhsmvY3HbBFjn bTLLx3XHXJuI4rA1XGLj0X5gs6OzvOH/gOuMAQmAJ2voM0OvlgWtCAzF3pK7nj81TLsz +vk8YJhs1iRkT/NVipsUoW6wraKoScMbJNIFVvuCOY15VJrq42uB0hH5YpSs74TV1YWB QyXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version :references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=4G/LKRpDaSk5G1Dq14NZaCJrO9TO40SQwizVUVV4jng=; b=MkRDJBBcywI3kV6pqtIteCPcHYAFBZFILA5Nyil1RYn37dKrb/s894kczbrW9CZhPx 8LrHUmnVWFHTfRi7tx+3LJv5F5eeKSRi6JvmspBocZqp9UxiZZW0ML9nZjcUenhZo16T JwGMZiwIm6nGRtPaG1OGqkmxvf7YoYZNfrSR36oNN4HEm9Dm0xBsFNA7tXoz4hnEtwyo /aXxExoXu6GJmToTAU4m19inIc4e9x2W4CmXxM/GuwbqdDWoJ5y4pBwWIOaEdsJdAon7 Po30+kkH6MIuD8J5/kLtR9IbDiBtmFlihMB9QilwcInc50mDJ6LtHbIPkTBHF645GrbV UVeQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r17si2485338pgh.299.2019.01.17.12.40.03; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728534AbfAQP7I (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:08 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43474 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725882AbfAQP7H (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:07 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0HFwmYb076121 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:06 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q2tejq15e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:06 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:59:04 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:59:02 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0HFx1Q764684224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:59:01 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B24E5204E; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:59:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.95]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1035204F; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:59:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:58:59 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Stefan Liebler Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] timer fix References: <20181221123453.GA102366@gmail.com> <20181223192926.GA3728@osiris> <20190117095102.GA88466@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190117095102.GA88466@gmail.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011715-0012-0000-0000-000002E95B46 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011715-0013-0000-0000-000021207834 Message-Id: <20190117155859.GE18351@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-17_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=685 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901170115 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > > - if (timr->it_requeue_pending == info->si_sys_private) { > > > + if (timr->it_interval && timr->it_requeue_pending == info->si_sys_private) { > > > timr->kclock->timer_rearm(timr); > > > > FWIW, with this patch the vanilla glibc 2.28 self tests > > rt/tst-cputimer1, rt/tst-cputimer2, and rt/tst-cputimer3 > > start to fail on s390: ... > > I haven't looked any further into this, just reporting.. otherwise the > > test systems seem to be healthy. > > Could you please check whether the top commit in tip:timers/urgent fixes > it: > 93ad0fc088c5: posix-cpu-timers: Unbreak timer rearming Yes, the test cases don't fail anymore. Thanks! A general question: since I reported this already last year, was the bug report not usable? I understand that x-mas holidays were in between, just wondering if new "glibc test case" fails are worth to be reported like I did.