Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2386226imu; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:15:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4xmRwQC4ZlQbwCSgGxe90IW1ncnz2Dl2aQW0GxsMuNiwZx3u4LkiftDjVEA9ZgMo8+d7Q8 X-Received: by 2002:a65:4683:: with SMTP id h3mr14297232pgr.225.1547759738383; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:15:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547759738; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Y0OMZ9XHSHrIpI0eD7+3G9R22+fwvOPrR1aT5wZLA3kjFcLJQ9Kf+onRSwgpXuH8Y5 64OjGzKZ7inz6S2/KSbx+wtTEWysWBKUfxUe0nvLbjbjthanZKizgPvRAsnxstzVHrey ObAOHMRvXjYe7wZeaFvGsGGHal0CBBKFrREdmiL+3x+V82/mn3PyzZYala1ogAGORD8C 9Q9GDWXOAdvMxMLc6wDP+8gB5htCcu1M/p7HUKkihXOxJ1uXzmm095eFllbFQcKDetxA u+HfdR6C8D89W2nBu6/oSqoZvwWBm7RXnoAcUpNcqAFj9DH1y00RoUNYfb3DhZ6Xhk/j /mmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=a8lza2fWqMQIISOBA2zwbVAD4ydLvisc2ffqkqc09zk=; b=JNUNQK2QXwwrj40ZRUJ1tY4zGGS+q4L76IZr4qXAnmJ0agodxcm1T8jMJYIAkxkLZu xP03+pox/W+xj9lnBjX8seEzfovMiA26NmP6cElpNcc8QP2szo7jvZXcvA+hOLwbt20m vLhow2EzllLY87MOn9fPbfyiCmkTJzrNIhORjKzADYDosj/UFe+IljSXhlDbLm7EwKof A6m0YaH/+PBRi4C95tFiDfzhFY+WgbIy1i6DUVVjpOADpCCvcvXI4rS2lP0737P7uh8e VUYK9NQrm2rpeFOv0xNwTtwmDoGD57yd2lVwFexOdetkToIpK6HALKS5tyCWjlbB+3n9 Xgig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FW+e53Rx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bi2si2556418plb.200.2019.01.17.13.15.18; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:15:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FW+e53Rx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729613AbfAQVDe (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:03:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-f67.google.com ([209.85.222.67]:33806 "EHLO mail-ua1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729299AbfAQVDd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:03:33 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f67.google.com with SMTP id c24so3987800uak.1 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:03:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a8lza2fWqMQIISOBA2zwbVAD4ydLvisc2ffqkqc09zk=; b=FW+e53Rxb+o7EAR/9OVCbdlHrNYD/aO9WdMscX88Yergx7ix76XQw/CoQZYUFwt40G +BLxAXk2YM6kA++OyQx94NbsXthcG4fsfGngDjdlqDefjbIMZoE6gmq8KHPbqWlDE7L3 3efk4gkISAuxXtLkOfPczoCXPaHdB++MUHFAGeU5UvZKQsEKgvbL6Z9as6cWcr7kOvR+ KcjtiDqUvAhMOUcW7Px71BJ6z+PWE0WnpmWRY4D7+q5jHl6GYmsBGLBysVXilecr+qc5 HgWz4z9ruMt0L1OXyf7st0C/9v6UbPggvBbXaACVsPmW5AgWfA5p6NDU8Uw1IVjQzTcr BkGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a8lza2fWqMQIISOBA2zwbVAD4ydLvisc2ffqkqc09zk=; b=LE67jP9MKr+3f/InopjgJpjHoMOGYA/2dO7WvAF7cyBjK7IMV9aMpceWcniZi2fOe7 AYymuQNvqm+UnMA5g+04mbJ4WLnGvNDWrV1BAZ+2hSB8I/p5K7ApNs10BbUNqceJdg+m h3u2SQv7FKRialPyzwSLUh9eMt+gknSJk6T152+FGA7rP/hCsvDv/TNqdqOk1Szv+eW4 wJePzefcSmTCiatFKFzLfdiRwKmK+Sbd8oVCgbMt7SLVyepwwhNrdzExfFalkoBp2o3n ea9XoaHZzZg6757E0DYfSfL4CF3UCUknGMwyS0d1B8jVyXOBA6erFEIhG9sLSTvLKK9A UAjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc869GN+7omwcwfFknXa93thBgitGKHfLGwijInQYxpXzuhVFMN OtkboKtvWGAu3bDQLL7q2ibgzmfTA9ml62bFCa+Rsf0QURY= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3f41:: with SMTP id i1mr5978486uaj.42.1547759011675; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:03:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1547169436-6266-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> In-Reply-To: <1547169436-6266-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> From: Stephane Eranian Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:03:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: fix perf_proc_update_handler() bug To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@elte.hu, Andi Kleen , "Liang, Kan" , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:17 PM Stephane Eranian wrote: > > The perf_proc_update_handler() handles /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > syctl variable. When the PMU IRQ handler timing monitoring is disabled, i.e, > when /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent is equal to 0 or 100, > then no modification to sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate is allowed to prevent > possible hang from wrong values. > > The problem is that the test to prevent modification is made after the > sysctl variable is modified in perf_proc_update_handler(). > > You get an error: > > $ echo 10001 >/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > echo: write error: invalid argument > > But the value is still modified causing all sorts of inconsistencies: > > $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > 10001 > > This patch fixes the problem by moving the parsing of the value after > the test. > > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian Ping. > --- > kernel/events/core.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index 3cd13a30f732..e5ede6918050 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -436,18 +436,18 @@ int perf_proc_update_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, > loff_t *ppos) > { > - int ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > - > - if (ret || !write) > - return ret; > - > + int ret; > + int perf_cpu = sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent; > /* > * If throttling is disabled don't allow the write: > */ > - if (sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent == 100 || > - sysctl_perf_cpu_time_max_percent == 0) > + if (write && (perf_cpu == 100 || perf_cpu == 0)) > return -EINVAL; > > + ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > + if (ret || !write) > + return ret; > + > max_samples_per_tick = DIV_ROUND_UP(sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate, HZ); > perf_sample_period_ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate; > update_perf_cpu_limits(); > -- > 2.7.4 >