Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp2450008imu; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:34:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5JipRBX5NuiKugOQaRtjl5XUAfLZC/L4BmPWWQQX5GvQVf2E7Dv1Q0pWLSG5CEKbdLWWnq X-Received: by 2002:a65:6215:: with SMTP id d21mr15189923pgv.289.1547764446262; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:34:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547764446; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yOvwyDfKCWAWoypTOZ1vnlgYF8GsUS38puMN0ZKOj9SQrBW9CjxoKuXslFQ8AWek2C qtrKzJ8+gT++c7Cdi+xwJRdkg6QA0maOZwfzbb7S9gmFTblbD/mTce834Mh0gMAILWt9 LteDlJ79qV/cV6Oasi+XGuN0Oxn4WRGIwhsYpeOuzR5EZQvy/IkLKC2bWArnaYeykGmB Nu2WzhzRS0XYhzHcG/wiCV3MSwQ9xJ4oDENMrSgPBMIuSxy17mj4vA1IDNR49ANtie3o md/rN+FDWEJ0RCw618b8Oz77VBPT1TdNXNO7i4atWNseewA28PyXZT60oSuW28TLlYtT ivzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=b2RMO1c4lvw3BMcGagTWAkv4tARi3z+lNfeaw/qgeYg=; b=b1Q4xaYvM9I+xMW+y/s1uHn+LhuofwSrv59e0mt4Cw00BIkSX8lVHQPqoHlJnuznWp yYwXHGb5TyAUSegy/D1IlJfG03O4fYfCVEHOfYElVkzQ/7AtLSsad57nYamtAW9HwtvU BZgDn/abKfRt4e6dWrKjv6bRcxiRmm+elxi+TiJjaa1KxIuAB31kyn9mkLO5oDJWTVtR my2rkgZ/MgEO+Nz8WkTKn+oypQIskTpW1yedSbaqKiOWfJf9PenoG+Xgyx/mFQtVKAr2 jN91qrmTFaPob3f+GHsFahzxUKBo/k5rhP22m2IUYNb6h49yd0aOYKNZzbA9Qf/6i32y cMtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d9si2097301pgb.105.2019.01.17.14.33.48; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:34:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727795AbfAQWJ0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:09:26 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:13718 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726898AbfAQWJ0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 17:09:26 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2019 14:09:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,489,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="139216808" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2019 14:09:24 -0800 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0B64301C4E; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:09:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:09:24 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephane Eranian Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , mingo@elte.hu, "Liang, Kan" , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: fix perf_proc_update_handler() bug Message-ID: <20190117220924.GN6118@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1547169436-6266-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:03:20PM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:17 PM Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > > The perf_proc_update_handler() handles /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > > syctl variable. When the PMU IRQ handler timing monitoring is disabled, i.e, > > when /proc/sys/kernel/perf_cpu_time_max_percent is equal to 0 or 100, > > then no modification to sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate is allowed to prevent > > possible hang from wrong values. > > > > The problem is that the test to prevent modification is made after the > > sysctl variable is modified in perf_proc_update_handler(). > > > > You get an error: > > > > $ echo 10001 >/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > > echo: write error: invalid argument > > > > But the value is still modified causing all sorts of inconsistencies: > > > > $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate > > 10001 > > > > This patch fixes the problem by moving the parsing of the value after > > the test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian > > Ping. Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen -Andi