Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework
To:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
        <davem@davemloft.net>
CC:     <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20190117200601.16416-1-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <aa72c1a7-ee16-dbde-0b75-96f9632ec431@ti.com>
 <641ae2ce-def9-6032-b8dc-cc71311bc993@grandegger.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <82d9f82c-1da6-2374-062b-538840afcc44@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:55:28 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <641ae2ce-def9-6032-b8dc-cc71311bc993@grandegger.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Wolfgang

On 1/18/19 12:56 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello Dan,
> 
> Am 17.01.19 um 21:08 schrieb Dan Murphy:
>> Wolfgang
>>
>> On 1/17/19 2:05 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Create a m_can platform framework that peripherial
>>> devices can register to and use common code and register sets.
>>> The peripherial devices may provide read/write and configuration
>>> support of the IP.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c          |   6 +
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c | 209 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h | 163 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 378 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.h
>>>
> 
> ... snip ...
> 
>> This patch set is working for the TCAN and at least boots on io-mapped devices.
>> We have a couple of customers who are looking at using this implementation and we would like to
>> start moving this patch set along in the review.
>>
>> I did not put a change log in here as there have been no comments for the last 3 patch sets I sent.
>>
>> This v4 squashes a few bugs I found during testing across all the files.
> 
> OK, after a very busy week I will try to find time for the review...
> finally.
> 

Thanks.  I anticipate a v5 as we debug the io mapped code and continue to test the TCAN code.

Dan

> Thanks,
> 
> Wolfgang.
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy