Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] y2038: add time64 syscalls
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, y2038@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     mattst88@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, paul.burton@mips.com,
        deller@gmx.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org,
        davem@davemloft.net, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
        jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        deepa.kernel@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        firoz.khan@linaro.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de>
From:   Dennis Clarke <dclarke@blastwave.org>
Message-ID: <be3863ae-d903-8e9e-5e6c-e4a58fac189d@blastwave.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:57:24 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:65.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/65.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 1/18/19 11:18 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is a minor update of the patches I posted last week, I
> would like to add this into linux-next now, but would still do
> changes if there are concerns about the contents. The first
> version did not see a lot of replies, which could mean that
> either everyone is happy with it, or that it was largely ignored.
> 
> See also the article at https://lwn.net/Articles/776435/.

I would be happy to read "Approaching the kernel year-2038 end game"
however it is behind a pay wall.  Perhaps it may be best to just
host interesting articles about open source idea elsewhere.

Dennis Clarke