Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261239AbUCALvl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:51:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261242AbUCALvl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:51:41 -0500 Received: from hell.org.pl ([212.244.218.42]:21519 "HELO hell.org.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261239AbUCALvh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:51:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:51:35 +0100 From: Karol Kozimor To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Michael Frank , Micha Feigin , Software suspend , Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? Message-ID: <20040301115135.GA2774@hell.org.pl> Mail-Followup-To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Frank , Micha Feigin , Software suspend , Linux Kernel list References: <1ulUA-33w-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <20040229161721.GA16688@hell.org.pl> <20040229162317.GC283@elf.ucw.cz> <20040229213302.GA23719@luna.mooo.com> <1078139361.21578.65.camel@gaston> <20040301113528.GA21778@hell.org.pl> <1078140515.21578.76.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1078140515.21578.76.camel@gaston> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1366 Lines: 36 Thus wrote Benjamin Herrenschmidt: > > USB UHCI driver could be a fine example of a regression -- it could survive > > suspend in 2.4 under certain conditions, this is no longer true for 2.6. > Well, it may have survived by mere luck... the fact is that 2.4 never That's very likely. Anyway, pure luck is still better than no luck whatsoever... > had an infrastructure allowing anything remotely safe for > suspend/resume. Right, but the point is that while 2.6 has such an infrastructure, its introduction actually completely broke UHCI suspend / resume. > > There's also a great deal of people, who can't resume when AGP is being > > used -- that is again a regression over 2.4. > There haven't been a regression in the AGP drivers themselves afaik. Which, again, leads us to conclusion that it was the driver model change that broke that. I'm not trying to criticize the driver model itself (I'm sure others have already done enough), but merely to emphasize that 2.6 is not yet ready for laptop users. Enough of that, this is becoming off-topic. :) Best regards, -- Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor sziwan@hell.org.pl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/