Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp3960313imu; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:46:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6Xbg1tDlnO2vud5Rte3p/C1MJcxlVmqL29ECyq/S//NAiYmaRSiHjg8/MGTmXYhkRpoRwl X-Received: by 2002:a65:4646:: with SMTP id k6mr15796827pgr.153.1547880408622; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:46:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547880408; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Dklc/eLUl1sUzeP64lYp1gI7WC0OgTo+YE6H0v083jX0+XcbLP010j6oxoOnPfAaiD +rOTu+2OxABuFY28Sk22X0ydmqhZ+Qbu30IyEsvSD3BKxEnEnHhcUzyNIHw0JqB7/vS/ 3FPgl9beB4reAiK7zAPmfBGuDBZUt80DWTTSll7oALfYy6ykfh24MD75A7uxO7FiNynK nz1mXGnNl4GObFFiBD3JYRgoUbrOu0Ve/sPC7slh18iK03uPqjPdAq1h7iiciMsR+6a5 tUp0hd6Suvpmcq7Q6P/K/w8l2OEvFsdMSXPuAOSrTgUKDsv+C4YjyBKWnWiLh84kWNme lgqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=zTAFDrBuZAevhL7Vo0ySCtMzEdq1s8xsXNLr06BDthQ=; b=QAddYMQ9J688J3cN8k6h86Qdfo9ws8uGu6kxIoTGZYxBCCGJ8Ew3CFpaocwgySrD5U 4GDmxRSBKAVqHre+Xn+Moo78i5kQNoNAnnrRh1zAB+eUEiW5gQYQ3vIXIvl2cN7/ghh6 grK0wHkfKiId0b1FypPYX9BSxqzNDa3WHp13i9RX/t9EgRYxEjlYJQQDbc2MkqfBUHv0 eSwOn9Aucy6Ms1Krf34xz8RDaQ+fbhHRK1yhsjWm6WOjLpdct7EoLW/xq33OP0rw4bzq 6ryLr06FWBy347aT+/BjFrySkOPC+uCzhftH4CyLT8M2bKOR2ew62ua5CMbknbKT8B+a Y2pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=aA4FWMQT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 64si7237035pfe.74.2019.01.18.22.46.01; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:46:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=aA4FWMQT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727472AbfASGkQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 01:40:16 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:58514 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726829AbfASGkP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 01:40:15 -0500 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0J6dsHb084281; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 00:39:54 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1547879994; bh=zTAFDrBuZAevhL7Vo0ySCtMzEdq1s8xsXNLr06BDthQ=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=aA4FWMQT4Kr+ESx/OAgYp6/RwMrQVpqg+4AqUhnURPqbzMb32GICvam6xdNOn06DB lUevIBZGvrW+ypO45tfWX10yI4X9WUWGrcsnGIgu2rl3SqSuNhSdyV9l8ifvPbYrc2 lllZW7JQZO5wvI53HhtFVV517MMY9PjBRIHLGrIg= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0J6drKL001209 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 00:39:53 -0600 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 00:39:53 -0600 Received: from dflp33.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.16) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 00:39:53 -0600 Received: from [172.22.216.68] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0J6dm5o012278; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 00:39:49 -0600 Subject: Re: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH v3 3/3] arm: omap_hwmod disable ick autoidling when a hwmod requires that To: Tony Lindgren , Andreas Kemnade CC: Discussions about the Letux Kernel , , , , , , , , References: <20190116220429.9136-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190116220429.9136-4-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190118154807.GV5544@atomide.com> <20190118181827.7163bee4@aktux> <20190118183630.GX5544@atomide.com> <20190118203832.3be7975e@aktux> <20190118204204.44db353f@aktux> <20190118194802.GZ5544@atomide.com> From: "J, KEERTHY" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:09:48 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190118194802.GZ5544@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/19/2019 1:18 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Andreas Kemnade [190118 19:42]: >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:38:47 +0100 >> Andreas Kemnade wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:36:30 -0800 >>> Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>>> til the next workaround. >>>> >>>>> That flags also causes the iclk being enabled/disabled >>>>> manually. >>>> >>>> Yes but SWSUP_IDLE for the interface clock to me currently >>>> just means: >>>> >>>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock" >>>> >>> well, if we want to manually disable it and not automatically, >>> we have to disable autoidle or it will be automatically disabled. >>> >>> Disabling it manually when it is already auto-disabled (by autoidle) is >>> just practically a no-op towards the clock. >>> >>>> and with your changes it becomes: >>>> >>>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock and block >>>> autoidle while in use". >>>> >>>> So aren't we now changing the way things behave in general >>>> for SWSUP_IDLE? >>>> >>> Yes, we are, so proper testing is needed. But If I read those comments >>> it was always intended this way but not fully implemented because it >>> appeared to be more work like needing a usecounter (which my patchset >>> also adds) for that autoidle flag. >>> >> and there are quite few hwmods marked by this flag. >> And then there are those clocks marked by this flags (on am33xx) which >> do not have that autoidle feature at all, so the risk is not too high. > > Keerthy, can you please test this series on top of the > related clock patches with your am335x PM test cases? Can you point me to the clock series that needs to be tested along with this? - Keerthy > > Regards, > > Tony > >