Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp4246307imu; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 05:31:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5ubB2GyUbj1NXm+tIzDI5ZNAYRa6tT5p0ppjGFS2DD3RO1MMxSAgcGrE7ZINffd+kLr2RY X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:96a:: with SMTP id 97mr22292133plm.45.1547904707148; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 05:31:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547904707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0aqPm1lgP5EFb0gsCMNX/THDQ8JHZBwCNhn/xfqbhC9RDS4eFNlCo1/GMNvxqeHxEV I90/Q4isCTfc/nKTfE6wyGojmJLxNV6bMOQuRQ03M8JwpTM1MmOyFzp0JJ/tcB79ixw6 4Fg7wGGjDrA0Qm6X+WwfVzJ18OE5lR1GrmlxcKINBCI7W46UIKAUeRFx/WlpUSQ8fQRP 26vg7FNv+Vwv4+eI0xOBwwGKQ+RkfTlQfMgXmoWg2orvtzK9m7UxjAAu+wgq+fiAstzR rRM3M0+lYPQwLs3d5tiUZRqIOwOEigaclUYF8UN4VR5eEhrYVzzEnVKzmtpAIuVHEpdU YuGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=2RL3pyrADuix6x4q3WeYCGPq3mMxCHKlR2kCJgSYs4o=; b=FFYbFVov2sElVd87ea8tWxFGTM6KGfRx8EED9J7YTO6r3P2Mgtv0txDlxHR+fYgd0Y XxDTAS2THlzoN3lKxqmjElDJG/2yuaOP+3l3KPDMyey5M0ZThd80lTZgqRk5Jg79N/px tjkhS6otrxV9MDRVQFBG/dFpB7Z2BI/7QJwnOJHBNnfJdjGXncX+R1W4kalZhQkEj0rH p5DapXRW6y4heGJVFClCjvi4z7oWoMnvG8vlwEdcXcl702Ykxl2yGH7+mU3xxGWawDxZ SSx8HaadEItDonO6JT/224pljjyfBJAVh0Fx6NgFYf2yNma7dJpxbrPjHRuN9ZAORpMF wBuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1si7178295pld.239.2019.01.19.05.31.28; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 05:31:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728293AbfASN2j (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 08:28:39 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:43564 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727955AbfASN2i (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 08:28:38 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F0DA78; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 05:28:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBP.local (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E13323F557; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 05:28:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:28:33 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Marc Gonzalez Cc: Robin Murphy , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Ard Biesheuvel , Oscar Salvador , Wei Yang , Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sri Krishna chowdary , Qian Cai , LKML Subject: Re: kmemleak panic Message-ID: <20190119132832.GA29881@MBP.local> References: <20190118143434.GE118707@arrakis.emea.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:36:59PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/ > echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc021e00000 [...] > Call trace: > scan_block+0x70/0x190 > scan_gray_list+0x108/0x1c0 > kmemleak_scan+0x33c/0x7c0 > kmemleak_write+0x410/0x4b0 As per Robin's remark, this address seems to be pretty easy to reproduce. It also happens via scan_gray_list() which indicates an object kmemleak was informed about via kmemleak_alloc() (so this excludes the pfn that Qian noticed). Can you configure the kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN off just to avoid the bug being triggered early and run: mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug/ echo dump=0xffffffc021e00000 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak Then run another scan to make sure this is the address that triggered the page fault: echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak The above should tell us where the object that kmemleak is trying to scan came from. Of course, ideally we should bisect this but I haven't been able to reproduce it. -- Catalin