Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp4445003imu; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:31:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN79Ie9iD45B21Yqi3k5j6BMO8K+57CEmKOvpITJOVztja7LN124LhVPRNyjNdnQ8Y7xhpdL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:968d:: with SMTP id n13mr23997655plp.109.1547919110488; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:31:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1547919110; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LgXW5MCLIdgj/NDaYbQLxGGZ1ix0JpDKPZJdElSIGv8WKG+rrYU7HobxC4HZpoeH4d bKSOuedOqxo467Bhb3uLNGEwdwj4v9oiGiL+lm3Q1wDW6uUrOe5SrZ9D7HirLdoRsvNE KxrPYAxpS8XovOw51WEhQxzYzXm+Ayf0t35iGO6OHV7yi6GD3DfK6Azbb/KpozhoT05Y 2wauLHRzF5AXKCMx52wmh18gD/PffTqLOezWZnI/aSRh+5nETmBhCYfsoCA2ybRDde8v 1mm7wHuazT8kPwPiDyFFyN+SuXt1N3RS89gPqSksDSZndIs2XqY7VSbDn0y0F4buLZvN /16Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date; bh=GCPo7DZe0G01OqOuIWf1CrVvwkqfC5x8ZXVFp500Wjo=; b=g4sX9DoV7rVtGR5cyiSnYSGiSkySbkl8kzHcojr6X380AyO0nngZc2a9no1mTLjT7C mSrNZITWI7QnAd+riTJ6C+DTLgv7bHajRpCRpLtIGvcD/yUGs7j1iijvQq3yBBQAa+9V YVPg94gTf3/CB146mQ5FsGmVMeDypgCPiPmKzfvecCwXW6B8GQckETy7qk1fpr5ylhgA g50kWv9lISxf9KMxsxIALbZKYIhQVERBWXvU2FBL7aMeG06+FXKjq4NeV7lIz0BARzPq VTZDJzp+xPEEJajajPZUxQXk5YUSWAzgGTt0RB7cmclGsj1Clt+XTdbA+JBmQelc9M+M 0f5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j10si7928489pgn.365.2019.01.19.09.31.32; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:31:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728680AbfASR3O (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:29:14 -0500 Received: from bout01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.11.15]:37823 "EHLO bout01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728423AbfASR3N (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:29:13 -0500 Received: from mx04.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.214]) by bout01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gkuQi-0005RI-1s; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:29:12 -0700 Received: from plesk14-shared.xmission.com ([166.70.198.161] helo=plesk14.xmission.com) by mx04.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1gkuQh-000680-JS; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:29:11 -0700 Received: from hacktheplanet (unknown [73.58.156.101]) by plesk14.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C07211413; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:29:02 -0500 From: Scott Bauer To: David Kozub Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jonathan.derrick@intel.com Message-ID: <20190119172902.GA14875@hacktheplanet> References: <1547760716-7304-14-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1547760716-7304-14-git-send-email-zub@linux.fjfi.cvut.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-XM-SPF: eid=1gkuQh-000680-JS;;;mid=<20190119172902.GA14875@hacktheplanet>;;;hst=mx04.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.198.161;;;frm=sbauer@plzdonthack.me;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.198.161 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sbauer@plzdonthack.me X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong, XM_UncommonTLD01 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4879] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.5 XM_UncommonTLD01 Less-common TLD * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;David Kozub X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 191 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (1.5%), b_tie_ro: 2.0 (1.1%), parse: 1.02 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (6.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.99 (0.5%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (6.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.29 (0.7%), tests_pri_-900: 1.03 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 16 (8.2%), check_bayes: 14 (7.5%), b_tokenize: 4.6 (2.4%), b_tok_get_all: 4.2 (2.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.44 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (1.2%), b_finish: 0.66 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 131 (68.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.47 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.2 (1.1%), poll_dns_idle: 0.46 (0.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.9 (1.5%), tests_pri_500: 8 (4.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] block: sed-opal: check size of shadow mbr X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mx04.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:31:53PM +0000, David Kozub wrote: > From: Jonas Rabenstein > > Check whether the shadow mbr does fit in the provided space on the > target. Also a proper firmware should handle this case and return an > error we may prevent problems or even damage with crappy firmwares. > + len = response_get_u64(&dev->parsed, 4); > + if (shadow->offset + shadow->size > len) { > + pr_debug("MBR: does not fit in shadow (%llu vs. %llu)\n", > + shadow->offset + shadow->size, len); > + return -ENOSPC; > + } Can we please change this check to the following: if (shadow->size > len || shadow->offset > len - shadow->size) Thanks > -- > 2.20.1 > >