Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp5912190imu; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:16:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5G/Ky/MGtNTogShxcS9slPiKrEJShmR24A+hE9VWrmZer5eHV1auZpE1SPYctFjgVdxwpJ X-Received: by 2002:a65:4646:: with SMTP id k6mr22172367pgr.153.1548054961587; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:16:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548054961; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lDXryzM4W9QTsFSUnmvKK5z/babzKjsR0XgsVOUJsTFeVVvbbZZLE/eU3uF+1XlDK5 tm4BnTE9HJrgj/gmS6CbgMIhh6U2wqxBmXzXBGtxnNdnP/ZwL4INhEyYjBOCvd2dsxGx dVgwECF6LezaZLnddRxb7CU+nOWsPAuUK+NPTGKWU/TFGPR9CCR9K9kc582FqzHZC+pf XE4xWVG7Ut2w6l3z/7J5Hw5KTWSopjbgwC3E71Xu8OuUESd9Cf3f7+bGDX7XKmS+KlAv H3gpkh9HtS++w43Mcab3p3fkKLEsPpWFdeFLlNCidEcq1LsnrURmThxgZIfe0L2QB8rl wYkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=1MY2+aLxo+iQWNtqOUc8eCVRHprDMIc0zOaEbr27wQg=; b=fjdOHNwx+MOppWXQ3tZzM7zn0W9oPDULMWeS15bJKyG3A34adhmzwGH9A1AfYr77/o iB/38UPy6eh2GU2RXG9k1lNxSK+RUwS6L9LTgcWdYJns7JVJC/JTSiepj6Ytk1+xl4Cn wOPa5aVD577hlHdsfDTI8onAEIPpXUU8kQjbh5qJ/Oor0ZtxWsR8NLlLxg04S76yqdVc ZajDW24QPWXi9sUOoptc1N1aBRspLDHJDkf4GcgC6RvDt2uaa83CK945zHOatbqMEcLT kq5B5iHsQR32YTusnAXG1bS8wXX8gQZVs7QHZZ05MT+MFWCxRlNtT2hUiUL5XNbn2sUw LRvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=yuahOS1q; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j34si11885810pgj.557.2019.01.20.23.15.46; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:16:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=yuahOS1q; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728231AbfAUHNZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 02:13:25 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:33416 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728143AbfAUHNS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 02:13:18 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0L7CvFu073936; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:12:57 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1548054777; bh=1MY2+aLxo+iQWNtqOUc8eCVRHprDMIc0zOaEbr27wQg=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=yuahOS1qZlsJPXmhSwPvDweUePYI6MDLpbx3C+g72YnoykZ6h7vdBd0JyEqPf0HRp Hh2nJ0tWfuZq/fV9MjaGu9hCZtuXQ17IEgN7D//9XyZSIjeXo+v2NFVEbAy3OVFtr7 jZZI7qwqrM4y0Vzgj9NJLtzGBtIQcuMYHZBOCSLQ= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0L7CvHY106296 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:12:57 -0600 Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:12:54 -0600 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:12:54 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x0L7Cokg020788; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:12:51 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm: omap_hwmod disable ick autoidling when a hwmod requires that To: Tony Lindgren , Andreas Kemnade CC: , , , , , , , References: <20190116220429.9136-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190116220429.9136-4-andreas@kemnade.info> <20190118154807.GV5544@atomide.com> <20190118181827.7163bee4@aktux> <20190118183630.GX5544@atomide.com> <20190118203832.3be7975e@aktux> <20190118194536.GY5544@atomide.com> From: Tero Kristo Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:12:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190118194536.GY5544@atomide.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/01/2019 21:45, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Andreas Kemnade [190118 19:39]: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:36:30 -0800 >> Tony Lindgren wrote: >> >> [...] >>> til the next workaround. >>> >>>> That flags also causes the iclk being enabled/disabled >>>> manually. >>> >>> Yes but SWSUP_IDLE for the interface clock to me currently >>> just means: >>> >>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock" >>> >> well, if we want to manually disable it and not automatically, >> we have to disable autoidle or it will be automatically disabled. >> >> Disabling it manually when it is already auto-disabled (by autoidle) is >> just practically a no-op towards the clock. > > OK I buy that :) It should be probably added to the patch > description to make it clear what it changes. > > Tero, any comments on this change? Well, seeing the flag is pretty much only used for a handful of hwmods nowadays, it should be fine. OMAP3 PM should be tested with this change though, as there are couple of hwmods impacted on that platform. I wonder what happens to cpuidle when display is active... -Tero > >>> and with your changes it becomes: >>> >>> "manually enable and disable ocp interface clock and block >>> autoidle while in use". >>> >>> So aren't we now changing the way things behave in general >>> for SWSUP_IDLE? >>> >> Yes, we are, so proper testing is needed. But If I read those comments >> it was always intended this way but not fully implemented because it >> appeared to be more work like needing a usecounter (which my patchset >> also adds) for that autoidle flag. > > OK yeah the use count seems necessary. I'll test here > with my PM use cases. > > Regards, > > Tony > -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki