Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6000018imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:11:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7SVZdKvyIS4ZElB2VT4yI0te5zy6luXyp9vHm1fZ7gA94zeI6eB4dWfC5XaT8pv+L+7LqL X-Received: by 2002:a65:4381:: with SMTP id m1mr26962895pgp.358.1548061885749; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:11:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548061885; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hdj2MlhZTSaskpKmZw2Sk27SOa8aqqcCpbvsYahTY+hU1UINVyTmPiaFZmbkmnVlAq 4Sa3/iYAZ0UUAQGkwRy3GcjtfAwEKQo8YbYywFxa4xbfL0bJ48UqOtjo08ATh/IRaYf6 cRVDFFUW6fQ9av6CGFP8c1nDtlg41LR9x2Hoo+nE3iuvkPHWOs1MbJ9+kfDGvTXh0yt2 rmfabQyH45uxpZgWhCVSoE2U47/8FxFohXTU+I3xopWO+zmRWF0J15kVj+7n7umx+SnN ehXQrecl8pUuyELGs95Xz9L4HrhjCrxPBrYHrjqXtVi9M9AqvB6rS8i5btn4doGTqb67 Emtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=yTNFTtUEmdaeSLKSRslSVpn0/SB0pum0nXBnhqYSft8=; b=kxRkswdzvVDSPeiiwFIHSmAtQim3KnHfjlZlw8ggrwXs7exr7Jvdrm4sgmwKMG0gtd SEXuBIot00AM0HRlaxf99+CBUGVMxpt20hNtnGerDADNbZFLHNxKZtqAP/pYASxHLR0q dEn+hVtrMMdsjvcrfMaAs5lpzWzs4aSNldvco3Do73U8snrN8P9crxghCwdn+6CoLnTy 7tT3zt6GNt+4Y73fdTbsh6NWo4gvNOoik62SnQnE9bnhI/q4fdmHQb33LIBZkqcQC8Uw txqE8xmWe38FVcj2VZFVhFNv1Dayxw5Ivh9bAETl4UT0OMdJLAqCO2RMUyvjd45FGDMC Emyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si12715633ple.185.2019.01.21.01.11.09; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726059AbfAUJJL (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:09:11 -0500 Received: from mail-it1-f193.google.com ([209.85.166.193]:40074 "EHLO mail-it1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725879AbfAUJJL (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:09:11 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f193.google.com with SMTP id h193so14169520ita.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:09:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yTNFTtUEmdaeSLKSRslSVpn0/SB0pum0nXBnhqYSft8=; b=AoYNh1x3w3I4uH1kzSP69Z/wQDWovrokIncffOP/fsGigrXFin3lNHrJeTUzazzV+f 1+9AI2vDvITt3n0IQBXYY4bGU6K1qnHPpEKdNxscOuvRntj24V1vKJUMWbx1Y727DARl gCwja7fDnezKUf9OqVy3LhaA8qF5AYoWxfQt+aa7WoW64LqBpoS57zTtfQjpsyA0JrHM LdouSqOvBSI7h5zRk7POnR6/UzlpCNf3KM7Ch4cdKWxZYk1uQVidyZL0SG9hLAJhZpJS TGKZTvIvtB8FD/JpjezZX1JP0c2zUzolU4Ip+sAQfIzJ/HYw69IX4fHJBFqdmRw9xUcq jIPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukd25W6uDjdmyE1LNqZ6ZjerTC3heq8Ren5YzCIrF1WXarERgTue 9cYBqNqbMOcOX95TJ5cELrheir4V7UKbwddoEFpPkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a24:ce42:: with SMTP id v63mr16129333itg.136.1548061750125; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:09:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190118091733.29940-1-kasong@redhat.com> <1547812432.3982.55.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190118123437.GA30929@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20190118123745.GA31072@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Kairui Song Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:08:59 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] let kexec_file_load use platform keyring to verify the kernel image To: Dave Young , Mimi Zohar , David Howells Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Woodhouse , jwboyer@fedoraproject.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, Eric Biggers , nayna@linux.ibm.com, linux-integrity , kexec@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:28 PM Kairui Song wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:42 PM Kairui Song wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:37 PM Dave Young wrote: > > > > > > On 01/18/19 at 08:34pm, Dave Young wrote: > > > > On 01/18/19 at 06:53am, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 17:17 +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > > > > > > This patch series adds a .platform_trusted_keys in system_keyring as the > > > > > > reference to .platform keyring in integrity subsystem, when platform > > > > > > keyring is being initialized it will be updated. So other component could > > > > > > use this keyring as well. > > > > > > > > > > Kairui, when people review patches, the comments could be specific, > > > > > but are normally generic. My review included a couple of generic > > > > > suggestions - not to use "#ifdef" in C code (eg. is_enabled), use the > > > > > term "preboot" keys, and remove any references to "other components". > > > > > > > > > > After all the wording suggestions I've made, you are still saying, "So > > > > > other components could use this keyring as well". Really?! How the > > > > > platform keyring will be used in the future, is up to you and others > > > > > to convince Linus. At least for now, please limit its usage to > > > > > verifying the PE signed kernel image. If this patch set needs to be > > > > > reposted, please remove all references to "other components". > > > > > > > > > > Dave/David, are you ok with Kairui's usage of "#ifdef's"? Dave, you > > > > > Acked the original post. Can I include it? Can we get some > > > > > additional Ack's on these patches? > > > > > > > > It is better to update patch to use IS_ENABLED in patch 1/2 as well. > > > > > > Hmm, not only for patch 1/2, patch 2/2 also need an update > > > > > > > Other than that, for kexec part I'm fine with an ack. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Dave > > > > Thanks for the review again, will update the patch using IS_ENABLED > > along with update the cover letter shortly. > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Kairui Song > > Hi, before I update it again, most part of the new > platform_trusted_keyring related code is following how > secondary_trusted_keyring is implemented (surrounded by ifdefs). I > thought this could reduce unused code when the keyring is not enabled. > Else, all ifdef could be simply removed, when platform_keyring is not > enabled, the platform_trusted_keys will always be NULL, and > verify_pkcs7_signature will simply return NOKEY if anyone try to use > platform keyring. > > Any suggestions? Or I can just remove the ifdef in > security/integrity/digsig.c and make set_platform_trusted_keys a > inline empty function in system_keyring.h. > > -- > Best Regards, > Kairui Song Hi, after a second thought I'll drop the #ifdef in security/integrity/digsig.c in PATCH 1/2, and make the set_platform_trusted_keys function a empty inline function when CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING is undefined. But for other ifdefs in certs/system_keyring.c I think maybe just keep then untouched. They were used to strip out the platform_trusted_keyring variable and related function when CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING is not used, this should help reduce unused code and prevent compile error, also make code style aligns with existing code in system_keyring.c. Will sent v5 with above updates and fix a potential problem found by Nayna. -- Best Regards, Kairui Song