Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 21:22:36 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: M?ns Rullg?rd <mru@kth.se>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK?
Message-ID: <20040301202236.GF562@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20040229162317.GC283@elf.ucw.cz> <yw1x4qt93i6y.fsf@kth.se> <20040229181053.GD286@elf.ucw.cz> <yw1xznb120zn.fsf@kth.se> <20040301094023.GF352@elf.ucw.cz> <yw1xhdx8ani6.fsf@kth.se> <20040301103946.GA9171@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1078135138.3884.19.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au> <20040301124610.GA1744@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <1078164961.4408.25.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1078164961.4408.25.camel@laptop-linux.wpcb.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 784
Lines: 21

Hi!

> Forgive my ignorance, but I don't see how that could be something that
> makes suspend2 less stable than the already-merged versions. They have
> the same problem (assuming your patch hasn't been merged yet).

Okay... well...

swsusp2 is meant to be feature-full. in kernel swsusp is meant to be
stable. Perhaps swsusp2 manages to be both feature-full and stable at
same time; at that point I'm obviously doing not-too-good job.

								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/