Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6020553imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:37:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6rfSZfq7ai6GD9yrMEVQGatFerZUCakAWYEX3CpEMRbmTvVZzYgVIigIqJ9zQ/mq+GgWNS X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2bc5:: with SMTP id l63mr29863377plb.107.1548063448153; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:37:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548063448; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qy+E8XT7OIsEaoW6kLjYhiblfsqGOADK4UIArU9B+nisTiY9Fj+g8vvKtCLhdEXGzn Qmh7ctNvgPFNumCibC83FYjOXLn2oH9EepKBN8LhORJKEwcQLR8/F626+Iga+c8JGKUi MZKLP1i1utsEvj36UH2NGwWJjOe6hRJdyLZcbb93hfR4PKKccKDFwuiL9l5TAqpY9Wc4 uEarFCjq0BjDAk/5m9IseP9rfQw+G6X1/IeH6bWJDPyVWynj9egsql/7pzmq9ljfB4ny B3eI2prkYYWhJFdGFQBkeyZzWyZeYzoM09wp5dcV27g29WV6IazVR9sIZWO2ZhrFY5CE fZIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=1dnpqBXxEMcoUeiZzzAx1YujWj9U8BhmfvR0/V8bI3E=; b=DKs95gEigGFGOsRpecD0nYkwFPAsoy5yiSHpS39rzuaUw5ySS/SW0r7hg0alBRadv8 53OnhRbX7DDRgQaDmmHJqqN+V9ldWy1RUQcCNRK3mYxdPqNWIzKxlDs+2sDNAcUr9Qo2 dpPd+RhOSbmA9MTJgJIhOTuLuSL68mJw9Nwzw159LOeZCFv3CCQuE0lHPtqegOc6Rv+q YGZWyDVrIoQKpnOwJ7B8XIebIzcAbELEJrj2qjz5oWfaN87oVBTjg2I4xglPIZBWqTpS 6lOmrCT6Olx3c2PUUYetwSSbvyrDCwa9ZowuQ4IhQteZTBR7gn2F9HSylhpDa0tzgr7m yrhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17si12035210pgl.6.2019.01.21.01.37.12; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727733AbfAUJfD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:35:03 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:4954 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726133AbfAUJfD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:35:03 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,502,1539619200"; d="scan'208";a="52487020" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2019 17:34:58 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEB94C47E99; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:34:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.225.56) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:35:01 +0800 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:33:48 +0800 From: Chao Fan To: Borislav Petkov CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/6] x86/boot: Parse SRAT address from RSDP and store immovable memory Message-ID: <20190121093348.GB15754@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190107032243.25324-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190107032243.25324-6-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190116110158.GC15409@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190116110158.GC15409@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.56] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 1CEB94C47E99.AE6FB X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:01:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:22:42AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: [...] >> + >> +/* Determine RSDP, based on acpi_os_get_root_pointer(). */ >> +static acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void) >> +{ >> + acpi_physical_address pa; >> + >> + pa = get_acpi_rsdp(); >> + >> + if (!pa) >> + pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr(); >> + >> + if (!pa) >> + pa = bios_get_rsdp_addr(); >> + >> + return pa; >> +} Hi Boris, Talking in Kairui's thread may mislead you, let me clarify: I mean I am going to change get_rsdp_addr(). Since I see ACPI code: >acpi_physical_address __init acpi_os_get_root_pointer(void) >{ > acpi_physical_address pa; > >#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC > if (acpi_rsdp) > return acpi_rsdp; >#endif > pa = acpi_arch_get_root_pointer(); > if (pa) > return pa; So we need to parse boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr also between KEXEC and EFI: static acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void) { acpi_physical_address pa; pa = get_acpi_rsdp(); if (!pa) /* This line will be added in next version.*/ pa = boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr; if (!pa) pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr(); if (!pa) pa = bios_get_rsdp_addr(); /* If no acpi_rsdp_addr found in boot_params, fill in it here. */ return pa; } Then you said I shall fill the boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr, so in my understanding, if there is no acpi_rsdp_addr found in boot_params, we can parse RSDP by EFI/BIOS then fill it, other wise if it's found int boot_params, we need't to fill it. Thanks, Chao Fan >> + >> +/* Compute SRAT address from RSDP. */ >> +static struct acpi_table_header *get_acpi_srat_table(void) >> +{ >> + acpi_physical_address acpi_table; >> + acpi_physical_address root_table; >> + struct acpi_table_header *header; >> + struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp; >> + u32 num_entries; >> + char arg[10]; >> + u8 *entry; >> + u32 size; >> + u32 len; >> + >> + rsdp = (struct acpi_table_rsdp *)(long)get_rsdp_addr(); >> + if (!rsdp) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + /* Get RSDT or XSDT from RSDP. */ >> + if (!(cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) == 4 && >> + !strncmp(arg, "rsdt", 4)) && >> + rsdp->xsdt_physical_address && >> + rsdp->revision > 1) { >> + root_table = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address; >> + size = ACPI_XSDT_ENTRY_SIZE; >> + } else { >> + root_table = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address; >> + size = ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE; >> + } >> + >> + /* Get ACPI root table from RSDT or XSDT.*/ > >This comment is wrong here - should be above. > >> + if (!root_table) >> + return NULL; > ><---- newline here. > >> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)(long)root_table; >> + >> + len = header->length; >> + if (len < sizeof(struct acpi_table_header) + size) >> + return NULL; >> + >> + num_entries = (u32)((len - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)) / size); >> + entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, header, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)); >> + >> + while (num_entries--) { >> + u64 address64; >> + >> + if (size == ACPI_RSDT_ENTRY_SIZE) >> + acpi_table = *ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, entry); >> + else { >> + address64 = *(u64 *)entry; >> + acpi_table = address64; > >The same thing as in the previous patch - get rid of address64. > >> + } >> + >> + if (acpi_table) { >> + header = (struct acpi_table_header *)(long)acpi_table; >> + >> + if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(header->signature, ACPI_SIG_SRAT)) >> + return header; >> + } >> + entry += size; >> + } >> + return NULL; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> + * According to ACPI table, filter the immovable memory regions >> + * and store them in immovable_mem[]. >> + */ >> +void get_immovable_mem(void) >> +{ >> + struct acpi_table_header *table_header; >> + struct acpi_subtable_header *table; >> + struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma; >> + char arg[MAX_ACPI_ARG_LENGTH]; >> + unsigned long table_end; >> + int i = 0; >> + >> + if (cmdline_find_option("acpi", arg, sizeof(arg)) == 3 && >> + !strncmp(arg, "off", 3)) >> + return; >> + >> + table_header = get_acpi_srat_table(); >> + if (!table_header) >> + return; >> + >> + table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length; >> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *) >> + ((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_srat)); >> + >> + while (((unsigned long)table) + >> + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) < table_end) { >> + if (table->type == ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY) { >> + ma = (struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *)table; >> + if (!(ma->flags & ACPI_SRAT_MEM_HOT_PLUGGABLE)) { >> + immovable_mem[i].start = ma->base_address; >> + immovable_mem[i].size = ma->length; >> + i++; >> + } >> + >> + if (i >= MAX_NUMNODES*2) { >> + debug_putstr("Too many immovable memory regions, aborting.\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + } >> + table = (struct acpi_subtable_header *) >> + ((unsigned long)table + table->length); > >That's a lot of unnecessary casting AFAICT. You can return an unsigned >long from get_acpi_srat_table() and get rid of all that casting here. > > >> + } >> + num_immovable_mem = i; >> +} >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> index 9ed9709d9947..b251572e77af 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> @@ -87,10 +87,6 @@ static unsigned long get_boot_seed(void) >> #define KASLR_COMPRESSED_BOOT >> #include "../../lib/kaslr.c" >> >> -struct mem_vector { >> - unsigned long long start; >> - unsigned long long size; >> -}; >> >> /* Only supporting at most 4 unusable memmap regions with kaslr */ >> #define MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS 4 >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h >> index a1d5918765f3..b49748366a5b 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h >> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ void choose_random_location(unsigned long input, >> unsigned long *output, >> unsigned long output_size, >> unsigned long *virt_addr); >> +struct mem_vector { >> + unsigned long long start; >> + unsigned long long size; >> +}; >> + >> /* cpuflags.c */ >> bool has_cpuflag(int flag); >> #else >> @@ -116,3 +121,17 @@ static inline void console_init(void) >> void set_sev_encryption_mask(void); >> >> #endif >> + >> +/* acpi.c */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE >> +/* Amount of immovable memory regions */ >> +int num_immovable_mem; >> +#endif >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_SRAT_PARSE >> +void get_immovable_mem(void); >> +#else >> +static void get_immovable_mem(void) >> +{ >> +} > >Put those on a single line: > >static void get_immovable_mem(void) {} > >> +#endif >> -- >> 2.20.1 >> >> >> > >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. > >