Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6032310imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:54:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN57cZQayPm7JqPXu8SoupEjYfIsk67UcnAujs8ClfBhJCFzjqislEEUeDuGVMxwL8OsZUVm X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:209:: with SMTP id 9mr29925682plc.288.1548064450090; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:54:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548064450; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=htGRcnHjOGMfTWrHZ5Zj301S7TwwUglDV8oAhrj5RRMv71Nvo5dzLuX1L9mHyWDgIG 4G7eHRTSrUzrGUgseerzmfMWLxTpnVLMPs2A7sD/Utvp71GbwUL7/AkAd9Y9CzZB/9Ja 0cFtxAWdFMA76SNskezR5s1NonJFSSVFEuNVOHkDJq0+uCyiYLqdL/p9d7w/hpPcdcn3 Do6tm/We3EP0RvcBYV9eCKDthyVm1HM8KGEbqpimqk1zNW//QLv7zDpYNF2BwRYaFVgk m6Q++rCIE04fem/G7k+jEYPlxvTD3An2wZ7YlNTzyviRfqiq7hWJQg2CBxE9gm1Argky nJtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=KrCYuJY8PR+M26BEohcAH4sZrz9Jv1G+x87gx4zlefo=; b=bUDHZG1CN8FKbdcoooRRi72zFyMfuC5GhWLFXE8aF8gs8czlDjfH6Dkv6HbULkeh/j kFW5mu3zgcJRPGQqhAFRrX2LiwyO0Ot+WHeZyZZikLmD2KaUNit/o7JAJ7s+rmywfzAY OKEVzQ+vuoC7Os23Xo4+4Pb8aHI6uLSNxXWdbDXyhkFawcDi8uU/8TrYgBPtMikpIpfc wpViJqd8yReLmpVohQwnmzlRu0ElHxsbk2jgKv25SRuKeKovh4lQYHGbD/gxy2stQPSI yWmcXPWwFroX4TDfphKhI35JTXMt2hISqKzYahCy/9y0yhys+ycWBpxYxQX/Kpsnu/CZ ObcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l129si7491987pfl.284.2019.01.21.01.53.54; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 01:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727624AbfAUJwb (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:52:31 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:35961 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726133AbfAUJwb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 04:52:31 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,502,1539619200"; d="scan'208";a="52488180" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2019 17:52:29 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F484C47E9A; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:52:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.225.56) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:52:33 +0800 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:51:23 +0800 From: Chao Fan To: Borislav Petkov CC: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 5/6] x86/boot: Parse SRAT address from RSDP and store immovable memory Message-ID: <20190121095123.GD15754@localhost.localdomain> References: <20190107032243.25324-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190107032243.25324-6-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190116110158.GC15409@zn.tnic> <20190121093348.GB15754@localhost.localdomain> <20190121094214.GC15754@localhost.localdomain> <20190121094524.GD29166@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190121094524.GD29166@zn.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.56] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 34F484C47E9A.AC07A X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:45:24AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: >On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 05:42:14PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: >> Or I clear this function as: >> static acpi_physical_address get_rsdp_addr(void) >> { >> acpi_physical_address pa; >> >> pa = get_acpi_rsdp(); >> >> if (!pa) >> pa = boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr; >> >> if (!pa) >> pa = efi_get_rsdp_addr(); >> >> if (!pa) >> pa = bios_get_rsdp_addr(); >> >> if (pa && !boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr) >> boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr = pa; > >Or simply: > > if (pa) > boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr = pa; > Make sense. If pa is not zero, boot_params->acpi_rsdp_addr is zero or the same as pa, so will change it. Thanks, Chao Fan >-- >Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > >Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. > >