Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:15:19 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     y2038@lists.linaro.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        mattst88@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, paul.burton@mips.com,
        deller@gmx.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, deepa.kernel@gmail.com,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, firoz.khan@linaro.org,
        linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 28/29] y2038: rename old time and utime syscalls
References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190118161835.2259170-29-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-29-arnd@arndb.de>
Message-Id: <20190121121519.GE4020@osiris>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The time, stime, utime, utimes, and futimesat system calls are only
> used on older architectures, and we do not provide y2038 safe variants
> of them, as they are replaced by clock_gettime64, clock_settime64,
> and utimensat_time64.
> 
> However, for consistency it seems better to have the 32-bit architectures
> that still use them call the "time32" entry points (leaving the
> traditional handlers for the 64-bit architectures), like we do for system
> calls that now require two versions.
> 
> Note: We used to always define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME and
> __ARCH_WANT_SYS_UTIME and only set __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_TIME and
> __ARCH_WANT_SYS_UTIME32 for compat mode on 64-bit kernels. Now this is
> reversed: only 64-bit architectures set __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME/UTIME, while
> we need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME32/UTIME32 for 32-bit architectures and compat
> mode. The resulting asm/unistd.h changes look a bit counterintuitive.
> 
> This is only a cleanup patch and it should not change any behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
...
>  arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h              |  2 +-

For the s390 bits:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>