Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:19:24 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     y2038@lists.linaro.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        mattst88@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu, paul.burton@mips.com,
        deller@gmx.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
        schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, deepa.kernel@gmail.com,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, firoz.khan@linaro.org,
        linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/29] y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit
 architectures
References: <20190118161835.2259170-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190118161835.2259170-30-arnd@arndb.de>
Message-Id: <20190121121923.GF4020@osiris>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t
> today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing
> counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64'
> for clarification.
> 
> This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library
> that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of
> loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the
> big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point.
> 
> In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer,
> waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet,
> but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping
> around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they
> pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They
> will be dealt with later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl       | 20 +++++++++

For the s390 bits:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>