Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp6254474imu; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:55:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN62+PAfmXMTjXXgja8q3YsBgJ1ipeL9Q99pIuGmbVysLB+4Ihtnhj2o+vEik/8mVVZhjkjC X-Received: by 2002:a62:1a91:: with SMTP id a139mr30852624pfa.64.1548078953832; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:55:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1548078953; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fie2V/lEyOhUC+uxGSXtWY82QQ6z9N+1IqM3Fo+vXiyYjPoxZPJ1YGF9sLvUjQ77Jl /7eD/9wnE0rlphD6SFGk0MOW/8qDMajb2Z3DkA6oQCj3QQXpaVpCJo89uyATlPZ8dqFd xdMXZcPRDy194ljRSARk4VP5D78X5qrA0n5ah4mgt2xIhxDoTPrUl2yaO4kV4kRj+UkA 1ZDRUkt10w/M5iwU2d8mTA4NEUYqtBaOvcWYIYRTQRPJ7SnJMVSYX5oPzLUWe3fd63we 5tuTPiZk+ht2ftLSH+ntuUHeoa4VaYXL5wderVCoEVRcgsrMQo18/ucEgrVXJpfzx1IS IiWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=iWz27z7H8ehyp6MiGZL1FxR6AVxKq0RJ6lNo14vUsmI=; b=UbvmXVto8Z++EbOEKA7Bpdhh3ki5j11SYZVtxvc0oGUxkKMfF4liTKDWhKKmum076n 5ef7wBDxqRDLNDdkPPO3BYZt/Zx4hqE5hk3b3G+gH+KqGthN946qNhkHp18DaMS8X3Ch uP7gevyPoeDW7pau6xSrwcvTRwbu/5z7gMRhNF7JGcAGZlkhrpMcgj87nLm4FyJWleuh H1t3gyRf4yUqBRanfQEUZgKvZd0Uoy5edyrAtl5HshC6StIE1amzM/w7DIbU6Ne8+1Kt CP4My1InR/D1z22o5VD7gQdCFQ+nlMjh2bQ/vqDfaJArH6llGrr0wrXV1rKCHAazD2DY FsWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=OmdFP5Zw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q64si10965868pga.280.2019.01.21.05.55.38; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=OmdFP5Zw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731341AbfAUNxt (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:53:49 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37658 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730829AbfAUNxq (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:53:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED1E42084C; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:53:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548078824; bh=2ik21EzJ/b61s5CvV/bcDKUnHH4tgxa++PdyabZQKHY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OmdFP5ZwE7UoeIIjhk99WYBPsVyXiTQ4Z8TsSmNc/pcmd1XsaJ7Wm6DrOBpkN29Zd z04UmbVr+lufssNh/WjAvEH9CuZd5Ii9TkD1BFOvtqYocGC+gw8ylHaTxoNBvhD+s/ hNrS8n2Exe933c04QuPuVtnWwUVuhNn1//5auea4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Jens Axboe Subject: [PATCH 4.14 56/59] loop: Get rid of loop_index_mutex Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:44:21 +0100 Message-Id: <20190121122503.363013965@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190121122456.529172919@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190121122456.529172919@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara commit 0a42e99b58a208839626465af194cfe640ef9493 upstream. Now that loop_ctl_mutex is global, just get rid of loop_index_mutex as there is no good reason to keep these two separate and it just complicates the locking. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/loop.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ #include static DEFINE_IDR(loop_index_idr); -static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_index_mutex); static DEFINE_MUTEX(loop_ctl_mutex); static int max_part; @@ -1588,9 +1587,11 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_ static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode) { struct loop_device *lo; - int err = 0; + int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + err = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); + if (err) + return err; lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data; if (!lo) { err = -ENXIO; @@ -1599,7 +1600,7 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device * atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt); out: - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return err; } @@ -1608,12 +1609,11 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d struct loop_device *lo; int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); lo = disk->private_data; if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt)) - goto unlock_index; + goto out_unlock; - mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) { /* * In autoclear mode, stop the loop thread @@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d */ err = loop_clr_fd(lo); if (!err) - goto unlock_index; + return; } else if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound) { /* * Otherwise keep thread (if running) and config, @@ -1631,9 +1631,8 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *d blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue); } +out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); -unlock_index: - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); } static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = { @@ -1926,7 +1925,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t struct kobject *kobj; int err; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); err = loop_lookup(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift); if (err < 0) err = loop_add(&lo, MINOR(dev) >> part_shift); @@ -1934,7 +1933,7 @@ static struct kobject *loop_probe(dev_t kobj = NULL; else kobj = get_disk(lo->lo_disk); - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); *part = 0; return kobj; @@ -1944,9 +1943,13 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi unsigned long parm) { struct loop_device *lo; - int ret = -ENOSYS; + int ret; + + ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); + if (ret) + return ret; - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + ret = -ENOSYS; switch (cmd) { case LOOP_CTL_ADD: ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm); @@ -1960,7 +1963,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi ret = loop_lookup(&lo, parm); if (ret < 0) break; - mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound) { ret = -EBUSY; mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); @@ -1972,7 +1974,6 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi break; } lo->lo_disk->private_data = NULL; - mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number); loop_remove(lo); break; @@ -1982,7 +1983,7 @@ static long loop_control_ioctl(struct fi break; ret = loop_add(&lo, -1); } - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return ret; } @@ -2066,10 +2067,10 @@ static int __init loop_init(void) THIS_MODULE, loop_probe, NULL, NULL); /* pre-create number of devices given by config or max_loop */ - mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) loop_add(&lo, i); - mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); printk(KERN_INFO "loop: module loaded\n"); return 0;